| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data virtualization | Data platform | 15% | 2 of 99 | 17% | 18 | accepted challenger | |
| Data warehouses | Data platform | 0% | 16 of 26 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Snowflake at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Trino if you have technical resources - it's the most widely adopted open-source option” Kimi K2 · Data virtualization · budget prompt · first choice
“Trino is the best data virtualization platform for a company with a limited budget” MiniMax M2.5 · Data virtualization · budget prompt · first choice
“Trino if you have technical talent and want to avoid licensing costs entirely” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data virtualization · budget prompt · first choice
“best value choice is usually an open-source federation engine like Trino” GPT-5.4 mini · Data virtualization · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Trino/Starburst-style solutions can work well, but they may be the wrong choice if your use case needs heavy governance, complex business semantics” GPT-5.4 mini · Data virtualization · negative prompt · soft negative
“called out as open-source platforms with no certifications, which makes them risky in regulated environments” Perplexity Sonar · Data virtualization · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious if you lack the team to own connectors, upgrades, security, and query tuning.” GPT-6 Luna · Data virtualization · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 54 answers that named Trino and are not a share of its labels.
213 of the 213 domain citations in answers naming Trino came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 192 | 2 | 2026-07-18 | ||
| Podcast or video | 85 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | ||
| Conference or event | 80 | 0 | 2024-12-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2022-08-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Every page trino.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Trino's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: trino.io, trino.io/docs/current/security/jwt.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trino's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trino, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trino by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Trino is among the products AI models recommend first in Data virtualization this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.