IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › SwaggerHub · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SwaggerHub

13Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SwaggerHub was named 5 times in API management, where Kong Gateway led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 47

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 55

under the label threshold

Enterprise25 of 44

under the label threshold

In api management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SwaggerHub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
API management	Developer platform	4%	7 of 55	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SwaggerHub yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SwaggerHub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels2

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SwaggerHub - If you need strong API design governance and collaboration features” MiniMax M2.5 · API management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“SwaggerHub and Stoplight are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · API management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Other options to consider are Stoplight, SwaggerHub, and Redocly” Llama 4 Maverick · API management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“SwaggerHub: avoid it if you need a full API management platform” Perplexity Sonar · API management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SwaggerHub, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SwaggerHub was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kong Gateway11 of 131Not in the top three

Postman9 of 133Not in the top three

Apigee7 of 131Not in the top three

Amazon API Gateway6 of 131Not in the top three

Azure API Management6 of 130Not in the top three

Stoplight6 of 130Not in the top three

Zuplo5 of 132Not in the top three

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform5 of 130Not in the top three

Gravitee3 of 131Not in the top three

IBM API Connect3 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SwaggerHub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named SwaggerHub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

digitalapi.ai11

integrate.io8

moesif.com8

swagger.ioYour site8

zuplo.com8

gartner.com6

viasocket.com6

b2bsaastools.com5

g2.com5

gravitee.io4

Sixty-one of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming SwaggerHub came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

integrate.io/blog/api-management-tools8

moesif.com/blog/technical/api-development/Top-API-Managers8

swagger.io/blog/best-api-lifecycle-management-platforms8

digitalapi.ai/blogs/best-api-lifecycle-management-tools7

gartner.com/reviews/market/api-management6

viasocket.com/discovery/blog/tkjre6/Developer%20Portals%20&%20API%20Documentation/10-b6

b2bsaastools.com/blog/best-b2b-saas-developer-portal-tools5

digitalapi.ai/blogs/best-api-developer-portals5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SwaggerHub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SwaggerHub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at swagger.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.