IT AI Index

Index › Products › Stamus Networks · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Stamus Networks

5Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Stamus Networks was named 2 times in NDR, where ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business84 of 118

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 102

under the label threshold

Enterprise37 of 103

under the label threshold

In ndr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Stamus Networks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Network detection and response	Security operations	2%	16 of 102	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Stamus Networks yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Stamus Networks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Balance of Cost & Ease: Stamus Networks ... widely considered the most accessible commercial alternative” Qwen 3.7 Flash · NDR · budget prompt · first choice

“NDR built on open-source foundations - Pros: Transparent pricing model, scalable options” Kimi K2 · NDR · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Stamus Networks, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Stamus Networks was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Darktrace5 of 51Not among the top eight

Vectra AI4 of 51Not among the top eight

Corelight Open NDR3 of 50Not among the top eight

Security Onion2 of 51Not among the top eight

Suricata2 of 51Not among the top eight

Zeek2 of 51Not among the top eight

ExtraHop RevealX2 of 50Not among the top eight

Rapid7 InsightIDR2 of 50Not among the top eight

WatchGuard ThreatSync+ NDR1 of 51Not among the top eight

Check Point1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Stamus Networks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Stamus Networks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

comparitech.com3

g2.com3

zenarmor.com3

cotocus.com2

cybersecuritynews.com2

cybervendorguide.com2

datamation.com2

myhospitalnow.com2

sourceforge.net2

stamus-networks.comYour site2

Twenty-one of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Stamus Networks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

comparitech.com/net-admin/network-detection-response-software3

zenarmor.com/docs/network-security-tutorials/best-10-network-detection-and-response-ndr-to3

cotocus.com/blog/top-10-network-detection-and-response-ndr-tools-in-2025-features-pros-con2

cybersecuritynews.com/best-ndr-solutions2

cybervendorguide.com/guides/ndr2

g2.com/categories/network-detection-and-response-ndr2

g2.com/categories/network-detection-and-response-ndr/small-business2

myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-network-detection-response-ndr-features-pros-cons-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

stamus-networks.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Stamus Networks takes 2% of first choices and ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ndr platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ndr platforms”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 102 in NDR

Segment leader

21%

ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 5 answers
Its own site cited: in 5 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on stamus-networks.com

179

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Blog	8	undated
Podcast or video	8	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page stamus-networks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Stamus Networks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Stamus Networks is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: an explainable network security platform
stamus-networks.com
For: resellers, distributors, MSSPs, MDR providers, and technology partners
stamus-networks.com/partners
Free plan or trial: Explore Stamus Community. stamus-networks.com
Certifications: technical and sales certification
Hosting: On-premPrivate cloudFully air-gapped
Customers named: NATOBankingGlobal Software Engineering FirmInternational European BankFrench MSSPU.S. Public School SystemBulgarian MSSPGlobal Engineering SaaS Company
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations

What Stamus Networks's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: stamus-networks.com, stamus-networks.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Stamus Networks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Stamus Networks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Stamus Networks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Stamus Networks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Stamus Networks, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.