Every category where a model named Ramp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT financial management	IT operations and endpoint	6%	6 of 159	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9%
SaaS management platforms	IT operations and endpoint	0%	27 of 64	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Torii at 34%
Third-party risk management	Security operations	0%	68 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ramp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ramp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative5 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels5

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“some of the top-rated IT financial management software include: 1. NetSuite OpenAir 2. Ramp” Llama 4 Maverick · IT financial mgmt · budget prompt · first choice

“or Ramp if your main need is spend control with no software fee” Perplexity Sonar · IT financial mgmt · budget prompt · first choice

“Ramp if your main focus is expense management and spend control” MiniMax M2.5 · IT financial mgmt · budget prompt · first choice

“Consider Ramp instead if you also want corporate cards, expense management, and bill pay in one place.” GPT-6 Luna · SaaS management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ramp, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ramp was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuickBooks Online11 of 365Not among the top eight

Xero10 of 361Not among the top eight

Expensify9 of 360Not among the top eight

Cledara8 of 360Not among the top eight

Brex7 of 360Not among the top eight

SpendHound6 of 363Not among the top eight

Nicus ITFM Platform6 of 360Not among the top eight

Zoho Books6 of 360Not among the top eight

QuickBooks5 of 361Not among the top eight

Zylo5 of 361Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ramp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 36 answers that named Ramp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ramp.comYour site30

qobra.co18

use.expensify.com13

g2.com11

rippling.com11

thectoclub.com10

softwareadvice.com7

devopsschool.com6

rho.co6

cledara.com5

Eighty-seven of the 117 domain citations in answers naming Ramp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ramp.com/blog/finance-as-a-service-faas-top-tools-for-modern-finance-teams23

qobra.co/blog/best-financial-management-software17

use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/financial-management-tools12

rippling.com/blog/financial-management-tools11

thectoclub.com/tools/best-it-financial-management-software9

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-it-financial-management-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison6

cledara.com/pricing5

ramp.com/blog/financial-reporting-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ramp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ramp takes 6% of first choices and Nicus ITFM Platform takes 9%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “it financial management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “it financial management platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 246,000 a month (“ramp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 49,733 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 770,056 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 68,870 · 5,399 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 12,968
Paid Google search: 10 searches its ads show for, about 430 clicks and $13,511 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 46 text, 45 image, 29 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as Ramp Business Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 96 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 159 in IT financial mgmt

Segment leader

Nicus ITFM Platform

First choices: 10 across its categories
Named in: 36 answers
Its own site cited: in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on ramp.com

5,942

subdomains included

Content

2,331

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,964

Product · Integration

2 · 131

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	1,276	33	2026-09-29
Comparison	362	29	2026-09-29
Glossary or explainer	239	1	2026-07-09
Webinar or virtual event	143	0	2026-05-05
Template or tool	129	0	2026-05-27
Case study	104	undated
Report or ebook	61	1	2026-08-29
Conference or event	16	0	2025-12-16
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29Financial due diligence blog
2026-09-29Accrual vs deferral in accounting comparison
2026-09-298 Best Corporate Card Expense Management Platforms blog
2026-09-28S corp tax benefits guide blog
2026-09-28Expense management workflow blog
2026-09-28How to do payroll yourself for your small business blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

July 15, 2026Build with Rillet + Ramp MCPSan Francisco · hosted
July 9, 2026CLI & Cocktails with RampKilowatt, San Francisco · hosted
July 8, 2026Build with Campfire + Ramp MCPCampfire HQ, San Francisco · hosted

As the event pages on ramp.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ramp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Ramp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ramp is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Spend Management, Corporate Cards & Accounts Payable Solutions
ramp.com
For: finance teams
ramp.com
Price stated: Get started for free ramp.com
Starting price: 0 ramp.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Get started for free ramp.com
Integrations claimed: 200 ramp.com
Certifications: CCPAISO/IEC 27001PCI DSSSOC 1SOC 2FedRAMP ModerateCyber Essentials PlusGovRAMP
Customers named: eight sleepperplexitywebflowglossierNotionMindbody & ClassPassShopifyKIPP Nashville Public Schools
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Ramp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ramp.com, ramp.com/pricing, trust.ramp.com, ramp.com/platform, ramp.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ramp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ramp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ramp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Ramp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ramp, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.