Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 56 of 74, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedSentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management
1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management was named 1 time in Vuln management, where Rapid7 InsightVM led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market58 of 77
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In vuln management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 58 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Vuln management · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
comparitech.com1
cycognito.com1
expertinsights.com1
gartner.com1
invicti.com1
jit.io1
ninjaone.com1
orca.security1
pdq.com1
peerspot.com1
Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sentinelone.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management takes 0% of first choices and Rapid7 InsightVM takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sentinelone.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management takes 0% of first choices and Rapid7 InsightVM takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “vulnerability management platform”
2
Position for “vulnerability management platforms”
3
- Organic visits to its site
- about 446,702 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 36,548 · 3,580 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 19,511
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $780 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 58 of 77 in vuln management
Segment leader
30%
Rapid7 InsightVM
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 1 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 1 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sentinelone.com
10,071
subdomains included
Content
2,891
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
71 · 13
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,583 | undated | XDR, EDR | ||
| News or press | 440 | 8 | 2026-09-24 | Endpoint protection, XDR | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 224 | undated | XDR, SIEM | ||
| Report or ebook | 224 | undated | XDR, Endpoint protection | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 189 | undated | CSPM, CNAPP | ||
| Comparison | 132 | undated | SIEM, EDR | ||
| Case study | 38 | undated | EDR | ||
| Template or tool | 24 | undated | SIEM | ||
| Conference or event | 20 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | XDR | |
| Podcast or video | 17 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Sentinelone extends wayfinder threat huntings continuous coverage to aws azure and google cloud news or press
- 2026-09-17New study from sentinelone sp globals 451 research uncovers widely divergent enterprise readiness for autonomous soc ado news or press
- 2026-09-15Sentinelone named an ai security platform leader in latio 2026 ai security market report news or press
- 2026-09-03Sentinelone expands wayfinder frontier ai services with openai daybreak models news or press
- 2026-08-26Sentinelone and tenable find cyber attackers routinely target edge device vendor ecosystems rather than individual vulne news or press
- 2026-08-20Professor james mickens katie moussouris christiaan triebert and dino dai zovi to keynote sentinelones labscon 2026 news or press
Events in person
Last twelve months
- April 20, 20262026 EMEA PartnerOne SummitCascais, Portugal · took part
As the event pages on sentinelone.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sentinelone.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name XDR (82); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Customers named
- Relay NetworkPeerspotRazorpay
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sentinelone.com/platform/singularity-core, sentinelone.com/platform/singularity-mobile, sentinelone.com/platform/singularity-control, sentinelone.com/platform/singularity-complete, sentinelone.com/platform/singularity-cloud-cspm. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SentinelOne Singularity Vulnerability Management, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.