IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Scaleway Object Storage · September 2026 Edition
Scaleway · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Scaleway Object Storage

5Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Scaleway Object Storage was named 2 times in Object storage, where Backblaze B2 led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Scaleway Object Storage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Object storageCloud and infrastructure0%44 of 46100%2under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Scaleway Object Storage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Scaleway Object Storage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“A documented case (2024) where a user found files were lost while migrating from GLACIER storage back to standard, and reports of poor support during the incident.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Object storage · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple reports of actual data loss... Users describe it as unreliable for backups.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Object storage · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Scaleway Object Storage, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scaleway Object Storage was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon S35 of 51Not in the top three
Google Cloud Storage5 of 50Not in the top three
Azure Blob Storage4 of 50Not in the top three
Backblaze B24 of 50Not in the top three
Cloudflare R24 of 50Not in the top three
DigitalOcean Spaces4 of 50Not in the top three
Linode Object Storage4 of 50Not in the top three
Wasabi4 of 50Not in the top three
Hetzner Object Storage3 of 50Not in the top three
Vultr Object Storage3 of 50Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scaleway Object Storage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Scaleway Object Storage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

linkedin.com4
mixpeek.com4
solved.scality.com4
digitalocean.com3
g2.com3
github.com3
impossiblecloud.com3
reddit.com3
aws.amazon.com2
cloud.ibm.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Scaleway Object Storage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scaleway Object Storage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scaleway Object Storage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scaleway.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack