Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 31 → 28 of 34
Linode · 1 category · Named, not rankedLinode Object Storage
9Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Linode Object Storage was named 5 times in Object storage, where Backblaze B2 led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business35 of 43
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market29 of 51
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Linode Object Storage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object storage | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 29 of 51 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Backblaze B2 at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Linode Object Storage held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Object storage · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 27 of 46
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Object storage | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 29 of 51 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Linode Object Storage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Linode Object Storage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“has a very similar entry price to DigitalOcean Spaces, also at $5/month for 250 GB and 1 TB outbound transfer” Perplexity Sonar · Object storage · budget prompt · alternative
“$5/month for 250 GB + 1 TB egress. Perfect for hobby projects or testing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Object storage · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Reported 5 GB object caps on some providers, and lack of object lock/WORM support on some of these services.” Perplexity Sonar · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative
“Their "S3-compatible" claims may not cover all use cases” Mistral Small · Object storage · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Linode Object Storage, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Linode Object Storage was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Linode Object Storage, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Linode Object Storage was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Linode Object Storage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Linode Object Storage and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
github.com8
digitalocean.com6
aimultiple.com5
solved.scality.com5
atlantic.net4
g2.com4
geekflare.com4
mixpeek.com4
cloud.google.com3
awesome.ecosyste.ms2
Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Linode Object Storage came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
linode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Linode Object Storage takes 0% of first choices and Backblaze B2 takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
linode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Linode Object Storage takes 0% of first choices and Backblaze B2 takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “object storage service”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “object storage services”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“linode object storage”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- linode.com shared with Linode's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,263 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,863 · 155 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 19,420
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 51 in object storage
Segment leader
46%
Backblaze B2
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 9 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 9 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Linode Object Storage
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Linode Object Storage; a claim can dispute any of them.
Linode 1Linode/Vultr 1
Follow Linode Object Storage
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Linode is the company behind Linode Object Storage.ShowHide
The company
Linode is the company behind Linode Object Storage.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Linode
- Linode Kubernetes Engine, Linode Managed Databases, Linode NodeBalancer
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Consolide los datos en la nube con un almacenamiento rápido y asequible compatible con Amazon S3
- For
- empresas
- Price stated
- precios transparentes linode.com/es/products/object-storage
- Free plan or trial
- Consiga hasta 5000 USD en créditos de nube linode.com/es/products/object-storage
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Linode Object Storage's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: linode.com/es/products/object-storage, linode.com/it/products/object-storage, linode.com/ko/products/object-storage, linode.com/fr/products/object-storage, linode.com/de/products/object-storage. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Linode Object Storage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Linode Object Storage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Linode Object Storage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Linode Object Storage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Linode Object Storage, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.