IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Boomi · September 2026 Edition

4 categories · Named, not ranked

Boomi

16Judge labels

1First choices

6Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

4Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Boomi was named 7 times in API management and 3 other categories, where Kong Gateway led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business38 of 47

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 55

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 44

under the label threshold

In api management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Boomi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
API management	Developer platform	2%	12 of 55	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 37%
API gateways	Developer platform	0%	30 of 51	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 61%
ETL and ELT	Data platform	0%	54 of 66	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Airbyte at 32%
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	0%	31 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Boomi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Boomi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Boomi is the safest mid-market B2B choice” Perplexity Sonar · API management · direct prompt · first choice

“Best if you also need strong integration/iPaaS + API management in one suite: Boomi” GPT-5.4 mini · API management · direct prompt · alternative

“For data-heavy or integration-intensive needs, consider SnapLogic or Boomi.” Mistral Small · Orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“lower-cost tiers are extremely restrictive regarding API calls and record volumes” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ETL · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Boomi, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Boomi was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kong Gateway10 of 161Not in the top three

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform10 of 161Not in the top three

Amazon API Gateway9 of 161Not in the top three

Apigee8 of 162Not in the top three

Azure API Management8 of 160Not in the top three

Zuplo5 of 160Not in the top three

Tyk4 of 160Not in the top three

IBM API Connect3 of 160Not in the top three

AWS Glue2 of 160Not in the top three

Apache Airflow2 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Boomi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 16 answers that named Boomi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkthat.ai4

integrate.io4

zuplo.com4

boomi.comYour site3

dev.to3

gartner.com3

moesif.com3

spotsaas.com3

6sense.com2

api7.ai2

Twenty-eight of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Boomi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

integrate.io/blog/api-management-tools4

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-api-management-service-platforms3

moesif.com/blog/technical/api-development/Top-API-Managers3

zuplo.com/learning-center/best-api-management-platforms-20263

6sense.com/tech/api-management2

blog.axway.com/learning-center/apis/api-management/list-api-management-vendors2

boomi.com/platform/api-management2

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/best-api-management-tools/1260333132

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Boomi

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Boomi; a claim can dispute any of them.

Boomi API Management 1Dell Boomi 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Boomi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Boomi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at boomi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.