AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Robocorp · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Robocorp

17Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in RPA for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 68 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In rpa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Robocorp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Robotic process automationIT operations and endpoint2%5 of 680%6under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power Automate at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Robocorp yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Robocorp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained14 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best RPA platform for a company with a limited budget is likely to be Robocorp, as it is considered a free pick for teams on a budget.” Llama 4 Maverick · RPA · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have developers who can work with Python, Robocorp gives you almost unlimited capability at essentially zero licensing cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · RPA · budget prompt · alternative
“Robocorp is a strong pick because one review specifically calls it the free pick for teams on a budget” Perplexity Sonar · RPA · budget prompt · alternative
“Otherwise, start with Robocorp's free tier to test your automation needs before committing to paid plans.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · RPA · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Robocorp, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Robocorp was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Power Automate15 of 1712Not among the top eight
UiPath9 of 171Not among the top eight
Automation Anywhere8 of 170Not among the top eight
UiPath Community Edition7 of 172Not among the top eight
Automation Anywhere Community Edition5 of 170Not among the top eight
Zoho RPA5 of 170Not among the top eight
ElectroNeek4 of 170Not among the top eight
Make3 of 170Not among the top eight
OpenRPA3 of 170Not among the top eight
Zapier3 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Robocorp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Robocorp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

layer3labs.io11
aimultiple.com10
costbench.com10
learn.g2.com10
resources.rework.com9
toolradar.com9
deepusecase.com7
us.fitgap.com7
automationatlas.io6
2hatslogic.com5

No domain is on file for Robocorp, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Robocorp stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“robocorp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 5 of 68 in RPA
Segment leader
51%
Microsoft Power Automate
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Robocorp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Robocorp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Robocorp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Robocorp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Robocorp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Robocorp, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.