Every category where a model named ElectroNeek for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Robotic process automation	IT operations and endpoint	0%	10 of 68	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power Automate at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ElectroNeek yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ElectroNeek across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	3
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ElectroNeek or Fortra Automate can give you a quick win without a large upfront investment.” MiniMax M2.5 · RPA · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Small Businesses ... Most affordable paid option for small businesses” Kimi K2 · RPA · budget prompt · alternative

“ElectroNeek targets SMBs for quick ROI on repetitive tasks” Grok 4.1 Fast · RPA · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for: Mid-market companies seeking affordability” MiniMax M2.5 · RPA · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ElectroNeek, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ElectroNeek was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power Automate16 of 1813Not among the top eight

UiPath13 of 182Not among the top eight

Automation Anywhere13 of 180Not among the top eight

UiPath Community Edition5 of 182Not among the top eight

Zoho RPA5 of 180Not among the top eight

Robocorp4 of 180Not among the top eight

Automation Anywhere Community Edition3 of 180Not among the top eight

Zapier3 of 180Not among the top eight

OpenBots2 of 181Not among the top eight

Blue Prism2 of 180Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ElectroNeek. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named ElectroNeek and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com11

g2.com10

aimultiple.com9

datamation.com9

layer3labs.io8

thectoclub.com8

2hatslogic.com7

automationatlas.io7

resources.rework.com7

solutionsreview.com6

No domain is on file for ElectroNeek, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-robotic-process-automation-software11

datamation.com/artificial-intelligence/top-15-robotic-process-automation-rpa-companies9

layer3labs.io/guides/rpa-software-and-vendors-compared8

thectoclub.com/tools/best-robotic-process-automation-process8

2hatslogic.com/blog/top-rpa-tools-compared7

aimultiple.com/rpa-software7

g2.com/categories/robotic-process-automation-rpa7

resources.rework.com/tools/automation/best-rpa-software-20266

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where ElectroNeek stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“electroneek”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 10 of 68 in RPA

Segment leader

51%

Microsoft Power Automate

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 18 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow ElectroNeek

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ElectroNeek's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ElectroNeek, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ElectroNeek by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ElectroNeek is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ElectroNeek, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.