AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

20Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was named 2 times in Network monitoring, where Auvik led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In network monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network monitoring and managementNetwork and edge0%59 of 7850%2under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase11 labels3
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if you have (or plan to hire) NetDevOps-focused engineers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Network monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“pure automation (Ansible Tower, but more dev-heavy)” Grok 4.20 · Network monitoring · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Terraform8 of 205Not among the top eight
Cisco Catalyst Center8 of 203Not among the top eight
Pulumi7 of 201Not among the top eight
Paessler PRTG Network Monitor5 of 201Not among the top eight
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor5 of 201Not among the top eight
AWS CloudFormation5 of 200Not among the top eight
ManageEngine OpManager5 of 200Not among the top eight
Auvik4 of 203Not among the top eight
OpenTofu4 of 202Not among the top eight
Crossplane3 of 200Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com9
blog.domotz.com7
pulumi.com7
auvik.com6
blog.invgate.com6
techtarget.com6
thectoclub.com6
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com5
em360tech.com5
sourceforge.net5

Sixty-two of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

redhat.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform takes 0% of first choices and Auvik takes 26%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “network monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “network monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“red hat ansible automation platform”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
10 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,347,338 a month
Searches its site ranks for
147,391 · 16,512 in the top three
Sites linking to it
105,781
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $281 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
117+ ads · 117 text · 117 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as Red Hat, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 61 in the year, 56 before. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 59 of 78 in network monitoring
Segment leader
26%
Auvik
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
20 answers
Its own site cited
in 19 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on redhat.com
13,605
subdomains included
Content
3,373
counted in the table below
Documentation
9
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,93412026-07-08API management, Object storage
Blog1,265102026-09-25API management, Object storage
Conference or event11302021-06-07
Webinar or virtual event2902020-09-28
Case study1302021-06-30
Comparison802018-05-21
Report or ebook602021-05-20
Podcast or video402025-06-05
Glossary or explainer1undated

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on redhat.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page redhat.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name API management (11); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform; a claim can dispute any of them.
Ansible Tower 1

Follow Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Implement enterprise-wide automation.
For
enterprise
Customers named
U.S. Department Of DefenseU.S. Navy
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: redhat.com, redhat.com/zh-cn/trust, redhat.com/en/solutions/public-sector/dod-devsecops, redhat.com/zh-cn/customers, redhat.com/zh-cn/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at redhat.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.