AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Reco AI · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Reco AI

15Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reco AI was named 8 times in SSPM and 1 other category, where Wing Security led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Reco AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations4%9 of 950%7under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30%
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%130 of 2330%1under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Reco AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Reco AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.520002
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Reco AI - Best for: Midmarket companies wanting a unified, integrated platform” MiniMax M2.5 · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation would be 8200.dev or Reco.ai” MiniMax M2.5 · SSPM · budget prompt · first choice
“5. Reco.ai for midmarket companies that want their security capabilities to come from a unified, integrated platform” Llama 4 Maverick · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Great for SaaS-integrated employee monitoring (260+ apps), high-risk interaction detection.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Reco AI, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reco AI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AppOmni9 of 156Not among the top eight
Obsidian Security9 of 153Not among the top eight
Nudge Security7 of 151Not among the top eight
Wiz7 of 150Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon SSPM6 of 151Not among the top eight
Wing Security6 of 150Not among the top eight
Zscaler SSPM5 of 150Not among the top eight
Grip Security4 of 150Not among the top eight
Spin.AI4 of 150Not among the top eight
Valence Security4 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reco AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Reco AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com9
cipherssecurity.com8
reco.aiYour site8
gbhackers.com7
startupstash.com7
cyberpress.org6
cybersecuritynews.com6
saassecurity.io5
busistack.com4
cloudnuro.ai4

Fifty-six of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Reco AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

reco.ai ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Reco AI takes 4% of first choices and Wing Security takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sspm platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sspm platforms”
6
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“reco ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
12 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 12,799 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,013 · 159 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,899
Paid Google search
4 searches its ads show for, about 17 clicks and $1,111 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
111 ads · 55 text, 49 image, 7 video · 34 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2024, as RecoLabs.ai, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 92 in the year, 19 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 95 in SSPM
Segment leader
30%
Wing Security
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on reco.ai
927
subdomains included
Content
374
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
47 · 285
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog24712026-09-07SSPM, MFA
Glossary or explainer70undatedITDR, SSPM
Comparison41undatedSSPM, CSPM
Case study5undatedMFA
Template or tool5undated
Webinar or virtual event4undated
Conference or event1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page reco.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Reco AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Reco AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
Reco.ai 3

Follow Reco AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Reco AI is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Agent Security Platform
For
security teams
Integrations claimed
285 reco.ai
Certifications
CSA STAR Level 1ISO 27001AICPA SOCEU AI ActISO 42001GDPRISO/IEC 27001 SoAISO/IEC 27001:2022
Hosting
United States/Europe (based on customer selection)Europe
Customers named
BelkBigIDCSKTampa General HospitalExela Pharma SciencesBanco BS2BHG FinancialRuby Life
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial

What Reco AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: reco.ai, trust.reco.ai, reco.ai/platform, reco.ai/customers, reco.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reco AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reco AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reco AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Reco AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Reco AI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at reco.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.