| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS security posture management | Security operations | 4% | 9 of 95 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Wing Security at 30% | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 130 of 233 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. Reco AI - Best for: Midmarket companies wanting a unified, integrated platform” MiniMax M2.5 · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation would be 8200.dev or Reco.ai” MiniMax M2.5 · SSPM · budget prompt · first choice
“5. Reco.ai for midmarket companies that want their security capabilities to come from a unified, integrated platform” Llama 4 Maverick · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Great for SaaS-integrated employee monitoring (260+ apps), high-risk interaction detection.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Reco AI and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-six of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming Reco AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 247 | 1 | 2026-09-07 | SSPM, MFA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 70 | undated | ITDR, SSPM | ||
| Comparison | 41 | undated | SSPM, CSPM | ||
| Case study | 5 | undated | MFA | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Every page reco.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Reco AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: reco.ai, trust.reco.ai, reco.ai/platform, reco.ai/customers, reco.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reco AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reco AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reco AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: