AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Wing Security · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Wing Security

87Judge labels
29First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
30% in SSPM for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 95 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
9 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 31 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Wing Security →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In sspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wing Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SaaS security posture managementSecurity operations30%1 of 953%31endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wing Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wing Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.520204
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash40004
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.2030003
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash03003
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K211013
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.513004
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B21003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels11
Paraphrase13 labels6
Comparative23 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels9
Scale-constrained5 labels3
Negative12 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative87 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wing Security stands out as particularly well-suited for mid-market teams due to its balance of affordability, ease of deployment, and practical SaaS discovery capabilities.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SSPM · direct prompt · first choice
“Vendors like Wing Security are highly popular for mid-sized organizations because they focus heavily on ease-of-use, low operational overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SSPM · scale prompt · first choice
“the strongest single pick is Wing Security if you want the best balance of mid-market fit, value, and SaaS discovery” Perplexity Sonar · SSPM · direct prompt · first choice
“The most frequently cited value-led pick for mid-market teams starting SSPM pragmatically is Wing Security” Muse Glimmer 30B · SSPM · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Less depth than Nudge or Obsidian” Kimi K2 · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wing Security, over the 87 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wing Security was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Valence Security21 of 870Not among the top eight
8200.dev19 of 879Not among the top eight
SaaS Alerts15 of 873Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wing Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 87 answers that named Wing Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com56
cyberpress.org55
startupstash.com48
guideflow.com47
us.fitgap.com41
nudgesecurity.com40
vcso.ai39
work-management.org39
g2.com35
reco.ai34

434 of the 434 domain citations in answers naming Wing Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Wing Security stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sspm platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sspm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
140 a month (“wing security”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
52 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 54 a month
Searches its site ranks for
66 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it
502
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 3 image, 2 text, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2025, as Wing Security Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 5 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
30%
rank 1 of 95 in SSPM
First choices
29
across its categories
Named in
87 answers
Its own site cited
in 86 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on wing.security
129
subdomains included
Content
103
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog9472026-09-22SSPM, TPRM
Case study302024-10-18
Glossary or explainer212026-08-19SSPM
Conference or event102024-05-02
Report or ebook102022-11-07
Comparison102022-12-18CSPM, SSPM
Template or tool102025-10-08
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page wing.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Wing Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Wing Security is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Agent exposure management
For
MDR & MSSP teams; SOC & exposure teams; Risk & AI adoption teams
Integrations claimed
1 wing.security
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001
Customers named
At-BayMonte CarloCarrefourApolloDriivzDoximTripledotElectra
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Wing Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: wing.security, trust.wing.security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wing Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wing Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wing Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Wing Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wing Security, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wing.security is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Wing Security is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

AI models recommend Wing Security first in SaaS security posture management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
AI models' first choice in SaaS security posture management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/saas-security-posture-management/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/wing-security--saas-security-posture-management-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in SaaS security posture management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS security posture management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
AI models' first choice in SaaS security posture management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/saas-security-posture-management/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/wing-security--saas-security-posture-management-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in SaaS security posture management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS security posture management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
AI models' first choice in SaaS security posture management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/saas-security-posture-management/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/wing-security--saas-security-posture-management-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in SaaS security posture management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the SaaS security posture management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.