1 category · RankedAppOmni
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS security posture management | Security operations | 4% | 8 of 95 | 29% | 42 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated AppOmni across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AppOmni: Strong SSPM-focused vendor; broad SaaS coverage; strong emphasis on SaaS app configurations, permissions, data exposure” GPT-5.4 mini · SSPM · comparative prompt · first choice
“AppOmni is a strong default pick if you have a lot of business-critical SaaS apps and want deeper posture coverage.” GPT-5.4 mini · SSPM · direct prompt · first choice
“it is the industry standard for securing complex enterprise SaaS environments that hold critical customer data” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SSPM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top-rated alternatives (fewer caveats): AppOmni (deep API, remediation; cons: pricey/complex for small biz)” Grok 4.20 · SSPM · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid: AppOmni (For now) ... For most mid-sized B2B companies, it is simply overkill.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SSPM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... require enterprise sales quotes and typically have high annual minimums” Kimi K2 · SSPM · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-focused platforms like AppOmni” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SSPM · budget prompt · hard negative
“Limited visibility into user activity and data flow with no context at the user level, lacks detection and response capabilities, and has no remediation for exposed data.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SSPM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AppOmni, over the 141 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppOmni was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 140 of the 141 answers that named AppOmni and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
579 of the 579 domain citations in answers naming AppOmni came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
appomni.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, AppOmni takes 4% of first choices and Wing Security takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“appomni”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 15 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 47,643 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,206 · 84 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,093
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 24 across its categories
- Named in
- 141 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 140 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 159 | 2 | 2026-07-30 | SIEM | |
| Conference or event | 38 | 2 | 2027-06-06 | ||
| News or press | 34 | 0 | 2026-05-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 22 | 0 | 2026-01-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 22 | 0 | 2026-04-20 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 20 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Case study | 13 | 0 | 2026-01-16 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 1 | 2026-07-08 | CSPM, SASE | |
| Template or tool | 10 | 2 | 2026-07-30 |
Most recent
- 2027-06-06Cisco live conference or event
- 2026-07-30Saas security prioritization checklist template or tool
- 2026-07-30Thank you saas security prioritization checklist template or tool
- 2026-07-30Saas security prioritization framework blog
- 2026-07-30Getting saas and aisecurity right webinar or virtual event
- 2026-07-22Securing claude for enterprise with appomni blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page appomni.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow AppOmni
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AppOmni is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the leading SSPM and AISPM platform for enterprises
- For
- enterprise companies and their security teams
- Integrations claimed
- 100 appomni.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2NIST CSFFedRAMP ModerateAPRA 234HIPAAGDPRSSCFTX-RAMP
- Customers named
- SANS InstituteSpencer FaneInversion6Trace3global airlineglobal asset management firmBluOcean CyberRightmove
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What AppOmni's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: appomni.com, trust.appomni.com, appomni.com/platform, appomni.com/article-type/case-studies, appomni.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppOmni's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppOmni, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AppOmni by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AppOmni is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AppOmni, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.