IT AI Index

Index › Products › Netacea · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Netacea

13Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Netacea was named 3 times in Bot management, where Cloudflare Bot Management led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business72 of 84

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise27 of 75

under the label threshold

In bot management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Netacea for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Bot management	Network and edge	0%	26 of 83	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare Bot Management at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Netacea yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Netacea across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	3	3
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Netacea, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Netacea was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DataDome13 of 135Not among the top eight

Cloudflare Bot Management12 of 135Not among the top eight

Akamai Bot Manager11 of 131Not among the top eight

Imperva Advanced Bot Protection11 of 130Not among the top eight

Kasada9 of 130Not among the top eight

HUMAN Security7 of 132Not among the top eight

Radware Bot Manager7 of 130Not among the top eight

Arkose Labs6 of 130Not among the top eight

Cequence Bot Management4 of 130Not among the top eight

Indusface AppTrana3 of 130Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Netacea. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Netacea and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

indusface.com12

cequence.ai9

spendbase.co8

forrester.com7

geetest.com7

g2.com6

humansecurity.com6

ioriver.io6

radware.com6

akamai.com5

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Netacea came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

indusface.com/blog/top-bot-management-software12

forrester.com/report/the-forrester-wave-tm-bot-management-software-q3-2024/RES1810137

geetest.com/en/article/best-bot-management-software7

spendbase.co/blog/cloud-management-tools/bot-management-solutions-for-enterprise7

ioriver.io/blog/best-bot-management-tools6

akamai.com/products/bot-manager5

techtimes.com/articles/319760/20260706/best-bot-detection-mitigation-software-2026.htm5

cequence.ai/learn/bot-management/best-bot-management-solutions-for-large-enterprises4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

netacea.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Netacea takes 0% of first choices and Cloudflare Bot Management takes 56%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “bot management solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “bot management solutions”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110 a month (“netacea”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 4,137 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 758 · 56 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,743
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

4 ads · 4 text · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as Netacea Limited, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 26 of 83 in bot management

Segment leader

56%

Cloudflare Bot Management

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 13 answers
Its own site cited: in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on netacea.com

1,111

subdomains included

Content

352

counted in the table below

Documentation

279

Product · Integration

2 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	129	0	2026-06-11	Bot management, MFA
Glossary or explainer	63	undated
Podcast or video	51	0	2026-05-22	Bot management, MFA
Report or ebook	42	0	2026-05-28	Bot management
Conference or event	38	0	2026-04-29	Bot management
Case study	19	0	2026-04-01
Comparison	6	undated
Webinar or virtual event	4	1	2026-09-22	Bot management

Most recent

2026-09-22Netacea and queue it team up to protect high demand online events webinar or virtual event
2026-06-11Book a demo forrester wave 2026 blog
2026-06-11Request an agentic audit forrester wave 2026 blog
2026-06-09Request an agentic audit blog
2026-05-28Agent trust management the business case report or ebook
2026-05-22What were hearing episode 18 how do we protect our login systems podcast or video

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page netacea.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Netacea

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Netacea; a claim can dispute any of them.

Netacea/Radware Bot Manager 1

Follow Netacea

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Netacea is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: BOT AND AGENT TRUST MANAGEMENT; Enterprise bot protection to stop account takeover, credential stuffing, web scraping, and API abuse. Agentless, AI-driven detection.
netacea.com
For: global enterprises
netacea.com
Certifications: CCPAGDPRSOC 2 Type 2SOC2 Type Compliant
Hosting: USEUGlobal
Customers named: Fortune 500 and FTSE100 companiesGlobal fashion retailerInternational education platformTravel booking websitemajor streaming serviceone of the world’s largest publishersmajor online pharmacyretailer of luxury shoe brands
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Netacea's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: netacea.com, trust.netacea.com, netacea.com/platform, netacea.com/case-studies, netacea.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Netacea's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Netacea, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Netacea by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Netacea is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Netacea, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.