Every category where a model named Prisma Access Browser for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Enterprise browsers	Security operations	2%	8 of 80	0%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Prisma Access Browser yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Prisma Access Browser across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Shortlist: Island, Prisma (Palo Alto), Chrome Enterprise Premium, Microsoft Edge/Defender, LayerX” Grok 4.1 Fast · Enterprise browsers · scale prompt · first choice

“look at Island or Talon” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise browsers · comparative prompt · first choice

“Talon (Palo Alto Prisma Access Browser) offers native browser + SASE integration with integrated zero trust browser + network capabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Enterprise browsers · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best if you want broad enterprise-browser security with strong isolation: Prisma Browser” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise browsers · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Prisma Access Browser, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prisma Access Browser was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Google Password Manager39 of 4218Compare →

Island Enterprise Browser39 of 429Compare →

Microsoft Edge for Business26 of 427Compare →

LayerX15 of 421Not among the top eight

Check Point Harmony Browse11 of 420Not among the top eight

Seraphic9 of 420Not among the top eight

Talon7 of 420Compare →

Edge for Business6 of 421Not among the top eight

Surf6 of 420Not among the top eight

NordLayer Browser4 of 423Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prisma Access Browser. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 42 answers that named Prisma Access Browser and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chromeenterprise.google26

expertinsights.com26

us.fitgap.com26

venn.com26

cybersecuritynews.com20

peerspot.com19

island.io18

gbhackers.com17

gartner.com15

paloaltonetworks.com15

No domain is on file for Prisma Access Browser, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

us.fitgap.com/search/browsers/enterprise23

expertinsights.com/web-security/the-top-enterprise-browsers21

cybersecuritynews.com/best-enterprise-browsers20

peerspot.com/categories/enterprise-browsers19

gbhackers.com/best-enterprise-browsers-compared17

chromeenterprise.google/16

venn.com/learn/browser-security/secure-enterprise-browser15

geekflare.com/guides/best-enterprise-browsers13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Prisma Access Browser stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“prisma access browser”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 33 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 80 in enterprise browsers

Segment leader

26%

Google Password Manager

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 42 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Prisma Access Browser

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Prisma Access Browser; a claim can dispute any of them.

Palo Alto (Talon) / Prisma Access Browser 1Prisma Access Browser (Palo Alto/Talon) 1Prisma Access Browser (formerly Talon) 1Prisma Access Browser by Palo Alto 1Prisma Browser 1Prisma Browser (by Palo Alto Networks) 1Talon / Prisma Access Browser 1

Follow Prisma Access Browser

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Prisma is the company behind Prisma Access Browser.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Prisma: Prisma AIRS, Prisma Access, Prisma Browser, Prisma Browser for Business, Prisma Cloud, Prisma Cloud DSPM

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prisma Access Browser's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prisma Access Browser, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Prisma Access Browser by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Prisma Access Browser is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Prisma Access Browser, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.