| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SOC agents | Security operations | 2% | 23 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24% | |
| Enterprise browsers | Security operations | 2% | 10 of 80 | 17% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Deploy Vigil or Talon alongside a local LLM or pay-as-you-go API.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI SOC agents · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose one dedicated browser (e.g., Island or Palo Alto/Talon)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Enterprise browsers · scale prompt · first choice
“look at Island or Talon” Perplexity Sonar · Enterprise browsers · comparative prompt · first choice
“Talon is grouped with Island as a purpose-built option for mid-market SaaS and BYOD/third-party governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · Enterprise browsers · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why not a full-blown "alternative" enterprise browser (e.g., Island, Vivaldi, Talon, Netskope)?” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Enterprise browsers · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Talon (now Palo Alto Prisma Access Browser) — *Caution: Complexity & Pricing*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Enterprise browsers · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 39 answers that named Talon and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Talon, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Talon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Talon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Talon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: