Every category where a model named Panther for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI SOC agents	Security operations	0%	41 of 104	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%
SIEM platforms	Security operations	0%	33 of 61	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 38%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Panther yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Panther across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider modern alternatives — Panther, Wazuh (open source/free), Sentinel (Microsoft), Exabeam” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · negative prompt · alternative

“This is good if you want more control and flexibility.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SOC agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“best if your team is detection- and data-lake-centric” GPT-5.4 mini · AI SOC agents · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Panther, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Panther was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Google Security Operations14 of 221Not among the top eight

Torq12 of 223Not among the top eight

Microsoft Sentinel9 of 221Not among the top eight

Splunk Enterprise Security8 of 221Not among the top eight

Dropzone AI6 of 223Not among the top eight

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM6 of 220Not among the top eight

Intezer AI SOC5 of 221Not among the top eight

IBM QRadar5 of 220Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Charlotte AI4 of 220Not among the top eight

Microsoft Security Copilot4 of 220Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Panther. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Panther and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com13

panther.comYour site13

underdefense.com13

paloaltonetworks.com9

intezer.com8

swimlane.com8

exaforce.com6

securityboulevard.com6

github.com5

sentinelone.com5

Seventy-three of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Panther came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-ai-soc-agents-platforms-for-enterprise-security-teams9

swimlane.com/blog/best-ai-soc-platforms7

intezer.com/guides/ai-soc/how-to-compare-agentic-soc-platforms5

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/ai-soc-tools-comparison5

panther.com/blog/best-siem-tools5

underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison5

exaforce.com/learning-center/ai-soc/best-ai-soc-for-enterprise4

exaforce.com/learning-center/ai-soc/top-ai-soc-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

panther.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Panther takes 0% of first choices and Dropzone AI takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai soc agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai soc agents”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,220,000 a month (“panther”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 127,829 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 4,345 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,147 · 63 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,633
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

71 ads · 40 text, 30 image, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as Panther Labs Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 36 in the year, 35 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 41 of 104 in AI SOC agents

Segment leader

24%

Dropzone AI

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 22 answers
Its own site cited: in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on panther.com

4,051

subdomains included

Content

510

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,597

Product · Integration

12 · 152

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	317	1	2026-09-08	SIEM, Infra monitoring
Podcast or video	76	0	2026-05-11	SIEM, EDR
Webinar or virtual event	55	46	2026-09-08	SIEM, ASM
Case study	21	20	2026-09-08
Comparison	19	5	2026-09-08	SIEM, Logs
Glossary or explainer	16	0	2026-06-14	SIEM
Report or ebook	5	5	2026-09-08	SIEM
Conference or event	1	0	2020-03-03

Most recent

2026-09-08Overview blog
2026-09-08Webinar monthly demo webinar or virtual event
2026-09-08Panther vs splunk comparison
2026-09-08Panther vs qradar comparison
2026-09-08Panther vs google secops comparison
2026-09-08Panther vs rapid7 comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page panther.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Panther

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Panther is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Complete AI SOC Platform
panther.com
For: security teams
panther.com
Integrations claimed: 100 panther.com
Certifications: SOC2 (Type2) CompliantPCI CompliantISO27001 Certified
Customers named: Cockroach LabsZapierDatabricksHealthEquityLoglassSnykCrestaTealium
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Panther's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: panther.com, panther.com/company/trust, panther.com/product/ai-soc-agent, panther.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Panther's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Panther, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Panther by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Panther is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Panther, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.