AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Network and edge › Network monitoring › Zabbix vs Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Network monitoring and management · October 2026 Edition

Zabbix vs Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

Zero of fourteen models named Zabbix first on the direct prompt; two named Paessler PRTG Network Monitor. Zabbix was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor by thirteen and Zabbix carries 47 labels and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor 52, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Zabbix

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share17%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate13%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4752A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zabbix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ManageEngine OpManager was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Auvik vs Zabbix · Auvik vs Paessler PRTG Network Monitor · ManageEngine OpManager vs Zabbix

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the network monitoring and management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ZabbixFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPaessler PRTG Network Monitor
Direct022 against Zabbix
Paraphrase02
Comparative01
Budget-constrained92
Scale-constrained001 against Zabbix
Negative103 against Zabbix · 2 against Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Zabbix and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor were named in the same answer 115 times, of the 309 answers naming Zabbix and the 171 naming Paessler PRTG Network Monitor. In those answers Paessler PRTG Network Monitor took the first choice thirty-nine times and Zabbix sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zabbix and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Zabbix Paessler PRTG Network Monitor first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zabbix on the left and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zabbix and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor stood in it.

Paessler PRTG Network Monitor first, Zabbix an alternative

2 of 14 modelsZabbix was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: Zabbix
GLM 4.7 FlashXPaessler PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: ManageEngine OpManager, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, Zabbix

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniSolarWinds Network Performance Monitor alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Zabbix
Gemini 3.5 FlashAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuvik alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor
Qwen 3.7 FlashManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Progress WhatsUp Gold, Zabbix
Kimi K2ManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Auvik, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Progress WhatsUp Gold
MiniMax M2.5ManageEngine OpManager, Paessler's PRTG Network Monitor alternatives: Zabbix
GPT-6 LunaAuvik alternatives: LogicMonitor, Paessler PRTG Network Monitor, Site24x7

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, Domotz, LogicMonitor
Grok 4.1 FastManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Progress WhatsUp Gold
Mistral SmallLogicMonitor alternatives: Datadog Network Monitoring, ManageEngine OpManager
Llama 4 MaverickDatadog Network Monitoring alternatives: Nagios, Netdata
Muse Glimmer 30BManageEngine OpManager alternatives: Auvik, Datadog Network Monitoring, LogicMonitor, Progress WhatsUp Gold, Site24x7, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Paessler PRTG Network Monitor leads by twenty-four points.
Paessler PRTG Network Monitor40%#1 of 12
Zabbix16%#2 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Zabbix leads at mid-market.
Zabbix17%#3 of 12
Paessler PRTG Network Monitor11%#4 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Zabbix leads by four points.
Zabbix4%#8 of 12
Paessler PRTG Network Monitor0%#11 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Zabbix

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“open-source is usually a poor fit for mid-market teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“For most small businesses, Zabbix and Nagios Core are the top free choices due to their comprehensive features and no-cost licensing.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Zabbix or Netdata since they are open-source and don't have licensing costs” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Paessler PRTG Network Monitor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Has had vulnerabilities including CSS injection (CVE-2022-35739) and other issues” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“PRTG — costs scale poorly and setup can be overwhelming” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“PRTG is positioned as the broadest out-of-the-box package for small to mid-sized IT teams that want a quick start with broad coverage.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Auvik or PRTG Network Monitor as top network management and automation software options” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most small-to-medium businesses with limited IT staff, a freemium tool like PRTG often provides the best value.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.