AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Ordr · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Ordr

11Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ordr was named 6 times in OT/IoT security and 1 other category, where Microsoft Defender for IoT led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ot/iot security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ordr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
OT and IoT securitySecurity operations0%83 of 10740%5under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21%
Network access controlNetwork and edge0%84 of 1110%1under 10 labels · led by Portnox Cloud at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ordr yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ordr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Agentless discovery, detailed asset classification, easy integration with Fortinet & Palo Alto firewalls” MiniMax M2.5 · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it is worth extra validation if your environment is predominantly industrial control systems” Perplexity Sonar · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“ORDR faces challenges in providing complete coverage in air-gapped networks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ordr, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ordr was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Armis Centrix8 of 112Not among the top eight
Forescout Vistaro Platform8 of 110Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for IoT7 of 110Not among the top eight
Claroty xDome6 of 113Not among the top eight
Dragos Platform6 of 113Not among the top eight
Nozomi Networks Guardian6 of 111Not among the top eight
Fortinet OT Security Platform5 of 110Not among the top eight
Tenable OT Security4 of 110Not among the top eight
Elisity3 of 110Not among the top eight
Forcepoint3 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ordr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Ordr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

networkintelligence.ai8
g2.com6
elisity.com5
gartner.com5
holidaylandmark.com5
netwitness.com5
guideflow.com4
sourceforge.net4
startupstash.com4
wifitalents.com4

Fifty of the fifty domain citations in answers naming Ordr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ordr.net
719
subdomains included
Content
630
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
11 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog438undatedMicrosegmentation, ASM
Glossary or explainer127undatedASM, NAC
News or press48undated
Comparison8undated
Case study4undated
Report or ebook4undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ordr.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Ordr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ordr; a claim can dispute any of them.
ORDR 2

Follow Ordr

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ordr is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-Powered Security for Every Connected Device
For
security teams
Integrations claimed
7 ordr.net · 130 ordr.net/platform pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II CertifiedHIPAA Compliant
Customers named
Franciscan HealthLeading Financial InstitutionFairview Health ServicesBeebe HealthcareProHealthCleveland ClinicCHRISTUS Health
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What Ordr's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ordr.net, ordr.net/glossary/compliance, ordr.net/platform, ordr.net/resources/case-studies, ordr.net/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ordr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ordr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ordr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Ordr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ordr, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ordr.net is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.