AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Noxus · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Noxus

3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Noxus was named 1 time in Process mining, where Apromore led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Noxus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Process miningIT operations and endpoint0%39 of 610%1under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Noxus yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Noxus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Noxus and Microsoft Power Automate as strong value alternatives depending on automation and Microsoft stack fit” Muse Glimmer 30B · Process mining · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Noxus, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Noxus was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Inkscribe AI Enterprise2 of 30Not among the top eight
ABBYY Vantage / FlexiCapture1 of 31Not among the top eight
Decisions1 of 31Not among the top eight
Hyperscience Hypercell1 of 31Not among the top eight
ProcessMaker1 of 31Not among the top eight
Azure AI Document Intelligence1 of 30Not among the top eight
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform1 of 30Not among the top eight
IBM Process Mining1 of 30Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining1 of 30Not among the top eight
Rossum1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Noxus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Noxus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

noxus.aiYour site3
checkthat.ai2
documo.com2
enterprise.inkscribe.ai2
erpresearch.com2
grooper.com2
guideflow.com2
raftlabs.com2
us.fitgap.com2
aitoolsatlas.ai1

Seventeen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Noxus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on noxus.ai
451
subdomains included
Content
72
counted in the table below
Documentation
293
Product · Integration
16 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog4832026-09-29
Comparison1452026-09-29
Case study662026-09-29
Report or ebook212026-09-29
Template or tool112026-09-29
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page noxus.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Noxus

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Noxus is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The system of execution for agentic operations.
For
teams at
Price stated
Free; £1,500/mo; Custom/mo noxus.ai/pricing
Starting price
Free noxus.ai/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free noxus.ai/pricing
Integrations claimed
400 noxus.ai/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 TYPE IISO 27001GDPRISO 27001:2022SOC 2HIPAAISO 27001 & GDPR ComplianceSOC 2 TYPE I & ISO 27001
Hosting
EU/UKBased in London & Lisbon
Customers named
Kuanto KustaEuropean Wholesaler

What Noxus's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: noxus.ai, noxus.ai/pricing, trust.noxus.ai, noxus.ai/solutions/retail. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Noxus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Noxus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Noxus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Noxus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Noxus, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at noxus.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.