| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed file transfer | Data platform | 0% | 32 of 97 | 27% | 11 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have specific compliance requirements (especially HIPAA/GDPR), MOVEit or Kiteworks would be stronger choices despite higher costs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · MFT · direct prompt · alternative
“MOVEit Cloud if you want a managed MFT service and are already invested in Progress/MOVEit” GPT-6 Luna · MFT · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“You already have MOVEit workflows... include MOVEit Cloud in the bake-off” GPT-6 Luna · MFT · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“legacy MFT tools like MOVEit and GoAnywhere suffered high-profile zero-day exploits in 2023” Llama 4 Maverick · MFT · negative prompt · hard negative
“the 2023 zero-day exploits against MOVEit and GoAnywhere showed that popular MFT tools can become high-value targets when exposed components are vulnerable” Perplexity Sonar · MFT · negative prompt · soft negative
“MFT platforms are frequent attack targets (e.g., MOVEit breaches), so scrutinize architecture over features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · MFT · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 34 answers that named MOVEit and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for MOVEit, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MOVEit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MOVEit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MOVEit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: