Every category where a model named JSCAPE MFT Server for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Managed file transfer	Data platform	0%	20 of 97	7%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JSCAPE MFT Server yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JSCAPE MFT Server across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative16 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Move to JSCAPE MFT Server or Globalscape EFT when you need managed workflows, partner automation, and centralized MFT governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · MFT · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best if you want straightforward secure automation with strong reviews: JSCAPE or Diplomat MFT” GPT-5.4 mini · MFT · direct prompt · alternative

“Sits in the mid-market with reasonable pricing and solid protocol support” Claude Haiku 4.5 · MFT · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose GoAnywhere or JSCAPE if you have heavy on-premises architecture” Gemini 3.5 Flash · MFT · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Caution level: Medium (due to usability, not security)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MFT · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JSCAPE MFT Server, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JSCAPE MFT Server was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Files.com21 of 429Not among the top eight

Axway SecureTransport19 of 423Not among the top eight

Progress MOVEit Transfer18 of 426Not among the top eight

GoAnywhere MFT18 of 423Not among the top eight

Globalscape EFT17 of 421Not among the top eight

Fortra GoAnywhere MFT11 of 424Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling Secure File Transfer11 of 420Not among the top eight

Cleo Integration Cloud9 of 421Not among the top eight

Cerberus FTP Server8 of 423Not among the top eight

Diplomat MFT8 of 422Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JSCAPE MFT Server. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 42 answers that named JSCAPE MFT Server and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sftptogo.com31

g2.com28

aimultiple.com25

expertinsights.com20

kiteworks.com18

dnsstuff.com17

learn.g2.com17

softwarereviews.com17

goanywhere.com16

sourceforge.net16

205 of the 205 domain citations in answers naming JSCAPE MFT Server came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sftptogo.com/blog/best-mft-platforms-managed-file-transfer28

expertinsights.com/data-security-and-privacy/the-top-managed-file-transfer-solutions19

learn.g2.com/best-managed-file-transfer-software17

aimultiple.com/managed-file-transfer-solutions15

dnsstuff.com/managed-file-transfer15

fast.io/resources/mft-software13

softwarereviews.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-enterprise13

g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jscape.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, JSCAPE MFT Server takes 0% of first choices and Files.com takes 43%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “managed file transfer solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “managed file transfer solutions”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 70 a month (“jscape mft server”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 32,819 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,749 · 453 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,657
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

62 ads · 56 text, 3 image, 3 video · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as REDWOOD SOFTWARE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 61 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 97 in MFT

Segment leader

43%

Files.com

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 42 answers
Its own site cited: in 42 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on jscape.com

910

subdomains included

Content

803

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

79 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	742	1	2026-08-19	MFT, EDI
Glossary or explainer	28	0	2025-11-06	MFT, MFA
Comparison	20	0	2025-10-22	MFT
Webinar or virtual event	6	undated		MFT
Case study	5	0	2020-08-07	MFT
Report or ebook	1	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-08-19Jscape by redwood 2026 3 support for fips 140 3 blog
2026-06-08Jscape by redwood 2026 2 blog
2026-05-04Sap rise strategy needs high performing file transfer blog
2026-02-26Hybrid managed file transfer blog
2026-02-18Jscape 2026 1 blog
2026-02-05Secure mft solution pricing blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page jscape.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as JSCAPE MFT Server

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JSCAPE MFT Server; a claim can dispute any of them.

JSCAPE MFT (by Redwood) 2JSCAPE MFT Server by Redwood 2JSCAPE 1JSCAPE (by Redwood) 1JSCAPE MFT Server (Redwood) 1JSCAPE MFT by Redwood 1

Follow JSCAPE MFT Server

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

JSCAPE MFT Server is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Managed file transfer engineered for the next decade of innovation
jscape.com
For: enterprise environments
jscape.com
Price stated: Request a personalized price quote for JSCAPE MFT jscape.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: free, no-obligation demo jscape.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II CertificationISO 27001AS2 DrummondHIPAAPCI DSSOFTP2 InteroperabilityFIPS 140-3GDPR
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What JSCAPE MFT Server's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: jscape.com, jscape.com/pricing, jscape.com/solutions/compliance, jscape.com/products/ftp. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JSCAPE MFT Server's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JSCAPE MFT Server, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for JSCAPE MFT Server by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where JSCAPE MFT Server is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name JSCAPE MFT Server, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.