Every category where a model named Globalscape EFT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Managed file transfer	Data platform	0%	78 of 97	38%	13	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Globalscape EFT yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Globalscape EFT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best-in-class managed file transfer solution for enterprises with complex and mission-critical file transfer requirements” Muse Glimmer 30B · MFT · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Globalscape (Fortra EFT) (Often compared; versatile protocols)” Grok 4.1 Fast · MFT · comparative prompt · alternative

“On-premises automation: Globalscape EFT or SolarWinds Serv-U” GLM 4.7 FlashX · MFT · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“older instances of Globalscape are heavily targeted and will not receive security patches” Gemini 3.5 Flash · MFT · negative prompt · hard negative

“Targeted in 2022–2023 breaches exploiting zero-days, exposing sensitive data from thousands of downstream orgs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · MFT · negative prompt · soft negative

“True enterprise MFT (like GoAnywhere or Globalscape EFT) often starts at thousands per year” Grok 4.1 Fast · MFT · budget prompt · soft negative

“Windows-only, less flexible for modern cloud-native environments” Kimi K2 · MFT · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Globalscape EFT, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Globalscape EFT was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GoAnywhere MFT17 of 335Not among the top eight

Axway SecureTransport17 of 332Not among the top eight

JSCAPE MFT Server17 of 331Not among the top eight

Progress MOVEit Transfer14 of 334Not among the top eight

Files.com12 of 335Not among the top eight

IBM Sterling Secure File Transfer11 of 330Not among the top eight

MOVEit10 of 331Not among the top eight

Cleo Integration Cloud9 of 330Not among the top eight

Fortra GoAnywhere MFT8 of 333Not among the top eight

Kiteworks MFT8 of 331Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Globalscape EFT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 33 answers that named Globalscape EFT and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sftptogo.com21

dnsstuff.com19

aimultiple.com17

g2.com17

kiteworks.com16

softwarereviews.com16

sourceforge.net15

globalscape.comYour site13

goanywhere.com13

itechguides.com12

146 of the 159 domain citations in answers naming Globalscape EFT came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sftptogo.com/blog/best-mft-platforms-managed-file-transfer20

dnsstuff.com/managed-file-transfer17

softwarereviews.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-enterprise13

learn.g2.com/best-managed-file-transfer-software12

expertinsights.com/data-security-and-privacy/the-top-managed-file-transfer-solutions10

aimultiple.com/managed-file-transfer-solutions8

aimultiple.com/goanywhere-alternatives6

cleo.com/blog/knowledge-base-top-mft-solutions6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

globalscape.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Globalscape EFT takes 0% of first choices and Files.com takes 43%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “managed file transfer solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “managed file transfer solutions”

Searches for its name, Google: 260 a month (“globalscape eft”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 6,441 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 868 · 114 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,742
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

2 ads · 2 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Fortra, LLC, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 78 of 97 in MFT

Segment leader

43%

Files.com

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 33 answers
Its own site cited: in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on globalscape.com

496

subdomains included

Content

368

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

21 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	131	0	2015-08-01	MFT, DLP
Report or ebook	90	undated		MFT
Case study	47	undated
Webinar or virtual event	40	undated		MFT, MFA
Podcast or video	32	undated		MFT
News or press	19	0	2022-09-01
Conference or event	4	undated
Comparison	4	undated		MFT
Glossary or explainer	1	undated

Most recent

2022-09-01Helpsystems acquires outflank news or press
2021-12-01Globalscape eft helpsystems simplifies file transfer offering customers 807 release news or press
2021-10-01Helpsystems acquires phishlabs continue expansion cybersecurity portfolio news or press
2021-07-01Ceo kate bolseth named second round mspbj 2021 women business award news or press
2020-12-01Globalscape completes soc 2 type 1 compliance engagement news or press
2020-09-01Globalscape wins gold stevier award 2020 international business awardsr news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page globalscape.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Globalscape EFT

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Globalscape EFT; a claim can dispute any of them.

Globalscape 4Globalscape (Fortra EFT) 1Globalscape (HelpSystems) 1Globalscape (now HelpSystems/ Fortra EFT) 1Globalscape EFT (Enhanced File Transfer) 1

Follow Globalscape EFT

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Globalscape EFT is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: On-Premises Managed File Transfer
globalscape.com
For: Windows-Centric Organizations
globalscape.com
Price stated: request a quote globalscape.com/try-globalscape-software/pricing
Free plan or trial: START A TRIAL globalscape.com
Certifications: SOC2 Type 2Drummond
Customers named: Harold Mandarino, Systems Supervisor at FISNHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT)InterglobeCiscoNHS Blood and TransplantInterglobe airline
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Globalscape EFT's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: globalscape.com, globalscape.com/try-globalscape-software/pricing, globalscape.com/security/trust, globalscape.com/solutions/secure-http, globalscape.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Globalscape EFT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Globalscape EFT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Globalscape EFT by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Globalscape EFT is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Globalscape EFT, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.