Index › Products › Minit · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Minit

10Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Minit was named 6 times in Process mining, where Apromore led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 63

under the label threshold

Mid-market23 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Minit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Process mining	IT operations and endpoint	0%	23 of 61	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Minit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Minit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Often used for process analysis and improvement with a practical, analytics-first approach.” GPT-5.4 mini · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative

“The Automation-First Platforms (e.g., UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate/Minit)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Process mining · scale prompt · alternative

“Choose Minit if you want AI-assisted event log analysis” Perplexity Sonar · Process mining · comparative prompt · alternative

“Minit (via Microsoft) — Best Traditional Mid-Market Pick” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Process mining · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Minit, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Minit was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Celonis Process Intelligence Platform9 of 92Not among the top eight

UiPath Process Mining8 of 91Not among the top eight

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence4 of 90Not among the top eight

Fluxicon Disco3 of 92Not among the top eight

IBM Process Mining3 of 91Not among the top eight

ProM3 of 90Not among the top eight

Apromore2 of 91Not among the top eight

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining2 of 91Not among the top eight

ABBYY Timeline2 of 90Not among the top eight

ARIS Process Mining2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Minit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 9 answers that named Minit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

processmind.com3

bardeen.ai2

erpresearch.com2

g2.com2

guideflow.com2

process.st2

processexcellencenetwork.com2

solutionsreview.com2

thectoclub.com2

appvizer.es1

No domain is on file for Minit, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

bardeen.ai/best/process-mining-tools2

guideflow.com/blog/process-mining-tools2

process.st/process-mining2

processmind.com/resources/blog/the-best-process-mining-tools-of-20262

thectoclub.com/tools/best-process-mining-software2

appvizer.es/analitica-web/mineria-datos/minit-process-mining1

articsledge.com/post/process-mining1

arxiv.org/abs/1905.061691

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Minit

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Minit; a claim can dispute any of them.

Microsoft Power Automate/Minit 1Minit (via Microsoft) 1

Follow Minit

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Minit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Minit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Minit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Minit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Minit, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.