IT AI Index
Index Vendors › MinIO · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

MinIO

64Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Object storage for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 46 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 27 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In object storage · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MinIO for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Object storageCloud and infrastructure0%9 of 4615%27accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MinIO yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MinIO across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502215
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K203003
GLM 4.7 FlashX00314
MiniMax M2.502103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labelsNone
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your mid-sized B2B company has strict data-sovereignty regulations... MinIO is the industry standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Object storage · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“self-hosted S3-compatible object storage can be cost-effective for organizations with existing hardware” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Object storage · budget prompt · alternative
“Multi-cloud strategy | MinIO (self-hosted) or ensure S3 compatibility” Kimi K2 · Object storage · scale prompt · alternative
“Open-source, S3-compatible, and designed for private cloud environments” Mistral Small · Object storage · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Only consider MinIO if you have the expertise and desire full control over infrastructure and are willing to manage compliance yourself.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Object storage · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Choose MinIO only if self-hosting or data residency requirements matter enough to justify the operational overhead.” Perplexity Sonar · Object storage · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Cost-effective if you have infrastructure expertise ... Requires more operational overhead” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Object storage · direct prompt · soft negative
“at 500 people, self-managing Ceph or MinIO in production requires dedicated SRE headcount” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Object storage · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MinIO, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MinIO was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon S359 of 6421Not in the top three
Wasabi50 of 642Not in the top three
Google Cloud Storage46 of 642Not in the top three
Backblaze B245 of 6411Not in the top three
Azure Blob Storage43 of 643Not in the top three
Cloudflare R240 of 649Not in the top three
DigitalOcean Spaces22 of 641Not in the top three
Ceph15 of 640Not in the top three
Scality RING12 of 642Not in the top three
Cloudian HyperStore12 of 640Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MinIO. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 64 answers that named MinIO and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mixpeek.com23
solved.scality.com23
cloudian.com18
github.com18
digitalocean.com17
gartner.com17
worldmetrics.org14
lowcloud.io13
backblaze.com12
impossiblecloud.com12

167 of the 167 domain citations in answers naming MinIO came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MinIO

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MinIO; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cloudian/MinIO 1MinIO (self-hosted) 1MinIO (self‑hosted) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MinIO's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MinIO, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at miniorange.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.