IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › MetTel · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

MetTel

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MetTel was named 2 times in SD-WAN, where Fortinet Secure SD-WAN led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market15 of 53

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In sd-wan · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MetTel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SD-WAN	Network and edge	0%	15 of 53	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Fortinet Secure SD-WAN at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MetTel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MetTel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“MetTel stands out not just for their software, but as a service provider.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SD-WAN · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MetTel, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MetTel was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cisco Meraki SD-WAN2 of 22Not in the top three

Fortinet Secure SD-WAN2 of 20Not in the top three

HPE Aruba EdgeConnect2 of 20Not in the top three

BT1 of 20Not in the top three

Cato Networks1 of 20Not in the top three

Comcast Business1 of 20Not in the top three

FatPipe SD-WAN1 of 20Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access1 of 20Not in the top three

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN1 of 20Not in the top three

Windstream1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MetTel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named MetTel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com2

palomarr.com2

softwarereviews.com2

cancomco.ca1

cisco.getuniqcli.com1

datacipher.com1

devopsschool.com1

digitalcarbon.io1

fortinet.com1

guideflow.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming MetTel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/sd-wan2

palomarr.com/nw/sd-wan/top-companies2

cancomco.ca/best-managed-sd-wan-providers-in-canada1

cisco.getuniqcli.com/resources/meraki-mx-vs-fortigate1

datacipher.com/10-top-sd-wan-solutions-for-enterprises1

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-sd-wan-management-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison1

digitalcarbon.io/blog/sd-wan-leaders-in-the-20241

fortinet.com/solutions/service-provider/managed-secure-sd-wan-service-with-fortinet1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MetTel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MetTel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mettel.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.