IT AI Index

Index › Products › Menlo Security · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Menlo Security

8Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Menlo Security was named 3 times in Client-side protection and 1 other category, where cside led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market57 of 120

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In client-side protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Menlo Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Client-side protection	Security operations	0%	57 of 120	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%
Enterprise browsers	Security operations	0%	38 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Password Manager at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Menlo Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Menlo Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Menlo Security is a strong option, but it appears to be sold with custom/self-service pricing rather than clearly budget-friendly list pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Enterprise browsers · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Menlo Security, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Menlo Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Island Enterprise Browser5 of 81Not among the top eight

Google Password Manager4 of 81Not among the top eight

LayerX3 of 80Not among the top eight

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint2 of 81Not among the top eight

Microsoft Edge for Business2 of 81Not among the top eight

cside2 of 81Not among the top eight

Seraphic2 of 80Not among the top eight

Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop1 of 81Not among the top eight

AWS WAF1 of 80Not among the top eight

Akamai Page Integrity Manager1 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Menlo Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Menlo Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

island.io4

venn.com4

cybersecuritynews.com3

startupstash.com3

cside.com2

csoonline.com2

cyberpress.org2

firstanalysis.com2

gbhackers.com2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Menlo Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cybersecuritynews.com/best-enterprise-browsers3

venn.com/learn/browser-security/secure-enterprise-browser3

cside.com/blog/real-time-browser-attack-visibility-tools2

cside.com/blog/top-client-side-security-tools-full-guide2

csoonline.com/article/573875/secure-web-browsers-for-the-enterprise-compared-how-to-pick-t2

cyberpress.org/enterprise-browsers-by-business-size-22

firstanalysis.com/research/cybersecurity-jan-20262

g2.com/categories/client-side-protection2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on menlosecurity.com

3,459

subdomains included

Content

905

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

24 · 4

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	648	1	2026-09-02	SASE, DLP
News or press	108	undated		Enterprise browsers, ZTNA
Webinar or virtual event	61	undated		Enterprise browsers, ZTNA
Glossary or explainer	31	undated		MFA, SASE
Case study	22	undated
Report or ebook	19	undated		Enterprise browsers
Comparison	11	0	2026-06-11
Conference or event	4	2	2026-09-22
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-22Gartner security risk management summit conference or event
2026-09-16Gisec global conference or event
2026-09-0210 file threats that bypass traditional security and how to stop them blog
2026-06-11Menlo security vs vdi browser as the control plane comparison
2026-05-26The best vdi alternatives for hybrid workforces in 2026 comparison
2026-03-18The next billion users wont be human blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page menlosecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Menlo Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Menlo Security is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Browser Security for Humans and Agents
menlosecurity.com
For: the new enterprise workforce: humans and AI agents
menlosecurity.com
Price stated: Menlo Security pricing is variable based on the products deployed and number of users. menlosecurity.com/pricing
Hosting: global points of presence
Customers named: Digital Nasional Berhad (DNB)Premier MitonSynapxeJacobson HoldingsM1 CommunicationsTokio Marine dR Co., LTDGösgen Nuclear Power PlantTop Credit Card Issuer
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications

What Menlo Security's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: menlosecurity.com, menlosecurity.com/pricing, menlosecurity.com/blog-categories/compliance, menlosecurity.com/solution/browser-sse, menlosecurity.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Menlo Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Menlo Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Menlo Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Menlo Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Menlo Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.