IT AI Index
Index › Vendors › Matillion Data Orchestrator · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Matillion Data Orchestrator

1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Matillion Data Orchestrator was named 1 time in ETL, where Airbyte led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market32 of 66
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In etl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Matillion Data Orchestrator for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ETL and ELTData platform0%32 of 660%1under 10 labels · led by Airbyte at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Matillion Data Orchestrator yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Matillion Data Orchestrator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The AWS-Native Alternative (Matillion)... Cons: Can become expensive at high volumes” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ETL · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Matillion Data Orchestrator, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Matillion Data Orchestrator was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Fivetran1 of 11Not in the top three
AWS Glue1 of 10Not in the top three
Apache Airflow1 of 10Not in the top three
Azure Data Factory1 of 10Not in the top three
Stitch1 of 10Not in the top three
dbt1 of 10Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Matillion Data Orchestrator. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Matillion Data Orchestrator and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudservus.com1
dataquest.io1
domo.com1
integrate.io1
linkedin.com1

Five of the five domain citations in answers naming Matillion Data Orchestrator came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudservus.com/blog/top-data-and-ai-platforms-for-mid-sized-enterprises1
dataquest.io/blog/etl-tools-practical-guide-with-examples1
domo.com/learn/article/data-integration-platforms1
integrate.io/blog/best-ai-etl-tools-for-mid-market-teams1
linkedin.com/pulse/best-data-integration-tools-small-business-mid-market-stacksyncdata-4zt1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Matillion Data Orchestrator's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Matillion Data Orchestrator, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at matillion.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack