Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 66 → 29 of 84
2 categories · Named, not rankedLivestorm
8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Livestorm was named 3 times in Streaming and 1 other category, where Confluent Cloud led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business31 of 88
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market31 of 98
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In streaming · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Livestorm for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming platforms | Data platform | 0% | 31 of 98 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Confluent Cloud at 39% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Video conferencing | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 30 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoom Workplace at 42% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Livestorm held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Streaming · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 30 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 31 of 98 |
| Video conferencing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 50, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Livestorm across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Livestorm across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Livestorm (Best for Usability & Browser-Based Ease)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Streaming · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Livestorm, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Livestorm was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Livestorm, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Livestorm was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Livestorm. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Livestorm and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
byteplus.com3
itechguides.com3
zoom.com3
automq.com2
dacast.com2
eventlive.pro2
guideflow.com2
jabra.com2
learn.g2.com2
livestorm.coYour site2
Twenty-one of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Livestorm came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
livestorm.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Livestorm takes 0% of first choices and Confluent Cloud takes 39%.ShowHide
Search and answers
livestorm.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Livestorm takes 0% of first choices and Confluent Cloud takes 39%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “event streaming platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “event streaming platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“livestorm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 124,272 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,851 · 469 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 20,738
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 98 in streaming
Segment leader
39%
Confluent Cloud
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on livestorm.co
2,539
subdomains included
Content
461
counted in the table below
Documentation
246
Product · Integration
10 · 63
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 226 | 16 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Blog | 135 | 93 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Case study | 31 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 25 | 0 | 2022-04-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 20 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 11 | 2026-09-07 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 4 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 4 | 2026-08-11 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Free webinar software webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-11Best claude connectors for marketing blog
- 2026-09-11Chatgpt for marketing blog
- 2026-09-07Demand generation tools blog
- 2026-09-07What is virtual learning glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-03Best time to host a webinar webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page livestorm.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Livestorm
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Livestorm is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Livestorm is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- All-in-one Webinar Software for Marketing Teams
- For
- marketing teams
- Price stated
- USD livestorm.co
- Starting price
- 1000 livestorm.co
- Free plan or trial
- Try it for free livestorm.co
- Integrations claimed
- 27 livestorm.co/pricing
- Certifications
- ISO 27001 certifiedGDPR compliant by designGDPR complianceGDPR compliantHubSpot certified
- Hosting
- EU-hostedEUUSA
- Customers named
- Vision Impairment AwarenessAhlstrom-MunksjöBaslerAssoConnectDesignhillFreshlyRecruiteeSpendesk
What Livestorm's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: livestorm.co, livestorm.co/pricing, livestorm.co/features/ai, livestorm.co/customers, livestorm.co/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Livestorm's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Livestorm, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Livestorm by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Livestorm is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Livestorm, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.