Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 84
1 category · RankedStreamYard
16Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Streaming for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 98 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 88
6%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market13 of 98
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In streaming · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named StreamYard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming platforms | Data platform | 2% | 13 of 98 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Confluent Cloud at 39% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, StreamYard held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Streaming · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 20 → 12 of 94
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 13 of 98 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated StreamYard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated StreamYard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“StreamYard is the best balance of cost and business features” Perplexity Sonar · Streaming · budget prompt · first choice
“StreamYard or Dacast offer good value for the price” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Streaming · budget prompt · alternative
“Best Professional Look on a Budget: StreamYard” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Streaming · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as StreamYard, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and StreamYard was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as StreamYard, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and StreamYard was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named StreamYard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named StreamYard and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dacast.com15
uscreen.tv8
blog.webex.com6
devopsschool.com6
eventlive.pro5
streamyard.comYour site5
byteplus.com4
cotocus.com4
alibaba.com3
apidog.com3
Fifty-four of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming StreamYard came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
streamyard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, StreamYard takes 2% of first choices and Confluent Cloud takes 39%.ShowHide
Search and answers
streamyard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, StreamYard takes 2% of first choices and Confluent Cloud takes 39%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “event streaming platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “event streaming platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110,000 a month (“streamyard”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 616 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 159,331 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,893 · 618 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13,892
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 98 in streaming
Segment leader
39%
Confluent Cloud
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on streamyard.com
10,901
subdomains included
Content
1,206
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 730 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 288 | 0 | 2026-03-18 | ||
| Podcast or video | 103 | 0 | 2026-02-01 | ||
| Comparison | 43 | 0 | 2026-02-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 20 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| Case study | 12 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2026-04-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-01-10 |
Most recent
- 2026-04-10How much internet speed do you need for multistreaming blog
- 2026-04-10How to multistream for free blog
- 2026-04-10Where to multistream every major platform compared blog
- 2026-04-10How to multistream to youtube twitch tiktok facebook and more report or ebook
- 2026-04-05What is multistreaming complete guide 2026 glossary or explainer
- 2026-04-02How multistreaming grows your audience blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page streamyard.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow StreamYard
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
StreamYard is its own company.ShowHide
The company
StreamYard is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A professional live streaming and recording studio in your browser.
- For
- creators
- Price stated
- Get started - it's free! streamyard.com
- Starting price
- 0 streamyard.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get started - it's free! streamyard.com
- Customers named
- Bridgetti Lim BandaPace MorbyChris Brogan
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What StreamYard's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: streamyard.com, streamyard.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when StreamYard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as StreamYard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for StreamYard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where StreamYard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name StreamYard, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.