IT AI Index

Index › Products › Legion Security · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Legion Security

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Legion Security was named 1 time in AI SOC agents, where Dropzone AI led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market91 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise58 of 95

under the label threshold

In ai soc agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Legion Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI SOC agents	Security operations	0%	91 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Legion Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Legion Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Legion Security, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Legion Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CrowdStrike Charlotte AI1 of 21Not among the top eight

7AI1 of 20Not among the top eight

Andesite AI1 of 20Not among the top eight

Cisco1 of 20Not among the top eight

Conifers CognitiveSOC1 of 20Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike1 of 20Not among the top eight

D3 Security1 of 20Not among the top eight

Dropzone AI1 of 20Not among the top eight

Exaforce1 of 20Not among the top eight

Google Cloud1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Legion Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Legion Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cybervendorguide.com2

intezer.com2

reliaquest.com2

swimlane.com2

arxiv.org1

corelight.com1

crowdstrike.com1

d3security.com1

exaforce.com1

f6s.com1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Legion Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cybervendorguide.com/guides/soc-automation2

swimlane.com/blog/best-ai-soc-platforms2

arxiv.org/html/2605.08316v11

arxiv.org/pdf/2510.003111

corelight.com/company/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-12-corelight-simplifies-alert-triage1

crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/crowdstrike-leads-new-evolution-of-security-automation-with-cha1

crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/four-ways-businesses-use-charlotte-ai-to-transform-security-ope1

crowdstrike.com/en-us/platform/charlotte-ai1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on legionsecurity.ai

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Blog	25	undated
News or press	5	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page legionsecurity.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Legion Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Legion Security is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Trust Center
trust.legionsecurity.ai
For: enterprise security
legionsecurity.ai/partners
Certifications: HIPAAISO/IEC 27001:2022ISO/IEC 42001:2023SOC 2 Type 2CSA STAR Level 1
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Legion Security's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: legionsecurity.ai, trust.legionsecurity.ai, legionsecurity.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Legion Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Legion Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Legion Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Legion Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Legion Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.