3 categories · Named, not rankedExaforce
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SOC agents | Security operations | 0% | 61 of 104 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24% | |
| Identity threat detection and response | Identity and access | 0% | 82 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Huntress Managed ITDR at 51% | |
| Managed detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 50 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Exaforce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Exaforce was flagged in independent analysis as the "newest entrant with limited independent validation so far."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI SOC agents · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Exaforce, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Exaforce was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Exaforce and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Sixty-nine of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming Exaforce came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
exaforce.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Exaforce takes 0% of first choices and Dropzone AI takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“exaforce”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,127 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 395 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 866
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $263 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 79 | 10 | 2026-09-17 | MDR, Insider risk | |
| News or press | 9 | undated | |||
| Case study | 8 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | MDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | ITDR, SIEM | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2025-10-21 | SIEM, SOAR | |
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2026-03-31 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | MDR |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17From raw logs to semantic intelligence blog
- 2026-09-15Introducing ai security blog
- 2026-09-11Exaforce blog why siems fall short blog
- 2026-09-09No off the shelf kit required a case study in custom built adversary in the middle infrastructure case study
- 2026-09-02San francisco tattooed exaforces first billboards campaign and honestly we get it blog
- 2026-08-18Exafiles caught in the middle responding to an aitm credential heist blog
Events in person
- June 11, 2026NJ SECON 2026Kean University, Union, United States · exhibited
- March 22, 2026SecOps leaders community event at RSAC 2026San Francisco · took part
As the event pages on exaforce.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page exaforce.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Exaforce
Follow Exaforce
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Exaforce is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic SOC and MDR
- For
- security teams
- Integrations claimed
- 100 exaforce.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2 CompliantSOC 2 Type 1 CompliantISO 27001 CertifiedPCI DSS CompliantHIPAA CompliantGDPR CompliantUSDP CompliantHITRUST Certified
- Customers named
- Automation AnywhereFuzeLottieFilesF500 Digital Infra CompanyLatioAcctonCFSFunction Health
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Exaforce's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: exaforce.com, trust.exaforce.com, exaforce.com/platform, exaforce.com/case-studies, exaforce.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Exaforce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Exaforce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Exaforce by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Exaforce is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Exaforce, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.