IT AI Index

Index › Products › 7AI · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

7AI

17Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. 7AI was named 8 times in AI SOC agents and 1 other category, where Dropzone AI led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market26 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise39 of 95

under the label threshold

In ai soc agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 7AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI SOC agents	Security operations	0%	26 of 104	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Dropzone AI at 24%
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	82 of 233	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 7AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 7AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“7AI utilizes "Dynamic Reasoning"... aiming for 95–99% reduction in tickets escalated to humans.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · first choice

“Full replacement for L1/L2 analysts | ReliaQuest GreyMatter, 7AI, SentinelOne Autonomous SOC” Kimi K2 · AI SOC agents · comparative prompt · first choice

“Prophet or 7AI | Alert overload in mature SOCs | Good starter” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI SOC agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Shadow AI & Data Leakage: 7AI or Specialized DLP” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI security · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 7AI, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 7AI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dropzone AI13 of 173Not among the top eight

Intezer AI SOC11 of 171Not among the top eight

Radiant Security8 of 170Not among the top eight

Torq7 of 171Not among the top eight

Exaforce7 of 170Not among the top eight

Prophet Security7 of 170Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike Charlotte AI6 of 170Not among the top eight

SentinelOne Purple AI6 of 170Not among the top eight

ReliaQuest GreyMatter5 of 170Not among the top eight

Splunk Enterprise Security5 of 170Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 7AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named 7AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

intezer.com13

resources.rework.com10

swimlane.com10

underdefense.com10

reliaquest.com9

securityboulevard.com8

github.com7

dropzone.ai6

paloaltonetworks.com6

panther.com6

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming 7AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

swimlane.com/blog/best-ai-soc-platforms10

intezer.com/blog/top-15-ai-soc-platforms-in-20269

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-agents/best-ai-agents-for-cybersecurity-20268

intezer.com/guides/ai-soc/how-to-compare-agentic-soc-platforms6

cybervendorguide.com/guides/soc-automation5

expertinsights.com/security-operations/top-ai-soc-platforms-for-business4

github.com/volod-k/agentic-ai-soc-knowledge-base/blob/main/research/how-to-evaluate-vendor4

marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/agentic-ai-security-operations-center-soc-market-23614

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

7ai.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, 7AI takes 0% of first choices and Dropzone AI takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai soc agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai soc agents”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 3,600 a month (“7ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 59 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,682 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 178 · 17 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 806
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $179 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

5 ads · 5 text · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2026, as 7AI, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 5 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 26 of 104 in AI SOC agents

Segment leader

24%

Dropzone AI

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on 7ai.com

217

subdomains included

Content

116

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

10 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	85	11	2026-10-02	AI SOC agents, SIEM
Glossary or explainer	9	0	2025-05-29	AI SOC agents, SIEM
News or press	9	undated		SIEM
Template or tool	4	undated
Case study	3	undated
Conference or event	2	undated
Report or ebook	2	undated
Podcast or video	2	undated

Most recent

2026-10-02Glm 5 3 open weight exploit development blog
2026-09-247ai is a finalist for the 2026 sinet innovator award. heres why sinet matters blog
2026-09-21Why security teams are rethinking the siem blog
2026-09-14Anthropics threat report details on ai driven attack blog
2026-08-26Human driven ai execution blog
2026-08-20Black hat 2026 foundational ai security proven in production blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page 7ai.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow 7AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

7AI is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI SOC Agents & Agentic Security Platform
7ai.com
For: security teams
7ai.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type II7AI Certified Solutions Consultant
Customers named: DXC TechnologyDuck Creek TechnologiesCole, Scott & KissaneAbacus Insights
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What 7AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: 7ai.com, 7ai.com/security, 7ai.com/platform, 7ai.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 7AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 7AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 7AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where 7AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name 7AI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.