AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Diplomat MFT · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Diplomat MFT

21Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in MFT for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 97 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Diplomat MFT →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In mft · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Diplomat MFT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Managed file transferData platform4%6 of 970%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Diplomat MFT yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Diplomat MFT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want the lowest total cost and your needs are fairly basic, look at Diplomat MFT first.” GPT-5.4 mini · MFT · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Diplomat MFT stands out” Kimi K2 · MFT · direct prompt · first choice
“Built specifically to offer mid-market organizations secure automation and dependable delivery without the bloated footprint” Gemini 3.5 Flash · MFT · scale prompt · alternative
“Fits mid-market organizations that want secure automation and dependable delivery” Claude Haiku 4.5 · MFT · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Diplomat MFT, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diplomat MFT was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
JSCAPE MFT Server8 of 210Not among the top eight
Axway SecureTransport6 of 210Not among the top eight
SFTP To Go6 of 210Not among the top eight
MOVEit4 of 211Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diplomat MFT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Diplomat MFT and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sftptogo.com15
g2.com14
expertinsights.com12
aimultiple.com11
fast.io10
sourceforge.net8
thectoclub.com7
coviantsoftware.com6
dnsstuff.com6
zipdo.co6

No domain is on file for Diplomat MFT, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Diplomat MFT stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
30 a month (“diplomat mft”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 97 in MFT
Segment leader
43%
Files.com
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Diplomat MFT

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diplomat MFT; a claim can dispute any of them.
Diplomat MFT (Coviant Software) 1Diplomat MFT (Coviant) 1Diplomat MFT (by Coviant Software) 1Diplomat MFT (by Coviant) 1Diplomat MFT by Coviant 1Diplomat MFT by Coviant Software 1

Follow Diplomat MFT

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diplomat MFT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diplomat MFT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Diplomat MFT by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Diplomat MFT is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Diplomat MFT, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.