Informatica · 1 category · Named, not rankedInformatica Persistent Data Masking
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data masking and test data management | Data platform | 0% | 34 of 140 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Informatica Persistent Data Masking across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: Large enterprises with broad governance and integration needs.” GPT-5.4 mini · Data masking · comparative prompt · alternative
“Comprehensive compliance & governance | Informatica” Kimi K2 · Data masking · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Informatica Persistent Data Masking, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Informatica Persistent Data Masking was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Informatica Persistent Data Masking and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Informatica Persistent Data Masking came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Informatica Persistent Data Masking stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“informatica persistent data masking”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Informatica's site (informatica.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Informatica Persistent Data Masking
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Informatica is the company behind Informatica Persistent Data Masking.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- typically used on test data to simulate production data with lower risk – or to mask attributes in records that do not need reversing
- For
- those who need to test with sensitive data or perform research and development on sensitive projects
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Informatica Persistent Data Masking's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: informatica.com/blogs/data-masking-and-encryption-are-different.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Informatica Persistent Data Masking's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Informatica Persistent Data Masking, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Informatica Persistent Data Masking by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Informatica Persistent Data Masking is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Informatica Persistent Data Masking, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.