| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data masking and test data management | Data platform | 0% | 24 of 140 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Other good options include Informatica Data Privacy Tool and IBM Infosphere Optim Data privacy, although they are more suited for large enterprises.” Llama 4 Maverick · Data masking · direct prompt · alternative
“is a budget-savvy option for companies that have already invested in IBM technologies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Data masking · budget prompt · alternative
“Mainframe + legacy system coverage | IBM InfoSphere Optim” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data masking · comparative prompt · alternative
“Real-time production protection | IBM InfoSphere” Kimi K2 · Data masking · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ibm.com/products/optim, ibm.com/products/optim-data-privacy, ibm.com/products/infosphere-qualitystage, ibm.com/products/infosphere-data-architect, ibm.com/products/optim-test-data-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: