AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Govern365 · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Govern365

6Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Govern365 was named 2 times in AI governance, where Credo AI led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai governance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Govern365 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI governance platformsData platform2%16 of 1350%2under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Govern365 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Govern365 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511002
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“consider affordable commercial platforms like Zelkir or Govern365 if you need managed features and support” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI governance · budget prompt · first choice
“Built for growing organizations needing real AI governance without enterprise complexity” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI governance · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Govern365, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Govern365 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Credo AI4 of 61Not among the top eight
Lumenova AI3 of 60Not among the top eight
OneTrust AI Governance3 of 60Not among the top eight
IBM watsonx.governance2 of 60Not among the top eight
Zelkir2 of 60Not among the top eight
GAIN1 of 61Not among the top eight
Platoya1 of 61Not among the top eight
Arize AI1 of 60Not among the top eight
Arthur AI1 of 60Not among the top eight
Bifrost1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Govern365. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Govern365 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

govern365.aiYour site6
superblocks.com4
infomineo.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
zelkir.com3
cloudeagle.ai2
credo.ai2
getaigovernance.net2
kosmoy.com2
sourceforge.net2

Twenty-three of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Govern365 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on govern365.ai
174
subdomains included
Content
97
counted in the table below
Documentation
51
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog77442026-10-04AI governance
Template or tool1472026-08-30AI governance
Comparison502026-06-26GRC, AI governance
Glossary or explainer102026-04-10

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page govern365.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Govern365

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Govern365 is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Governance Platform for Risk and Compliance
For
mid-market organizations
Price stated
Tier 1: Starter $239 /mo (billed annually); Tier 2: Professional $799 /mo (billed annually); Tier 3: Business $1,999 /mo (billed annually); Tier 4: Enterprise Let's talk govern365.ai
Starting price
239 govern365.ai
Free plan or trial
start 14-day free trial govern365.ai
Certifications
GAICC-G365 Certified AssociateGAICC-G365 Certified ProfessionalGAICC-G365 Certified Expert
Hosting
USAAustraliaNew Zealand
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, customers

What Govern365's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: govern365.ai, govern365.ai/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Govern365's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Govern365, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Govern365 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Govern365 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Govern365, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at govern365.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.