2 categories · Named, not rankedFair TPRM
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 4% | 9 of 116 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% | |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 2% | 12 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Fair TPRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the best cyber risk quantification (CRQ) tool is likely a free, open-source option like Fair TPRM's built-in FAIR calculator” Grok 4.20 · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · first choice
“a free calculator like FairCRQ or Fair TPRM is typically the practical first step for budget-constrained companies” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · first choice
“Go with LT-VRM or Fair TPRM (if you have the technical ability to self-host)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · first choice
“Free/Open Source | Third-party risk management + FAIR quantification” Kimi K2 · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fair TPRM, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fair TPRM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Fair TPRM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Forty-five of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Fair TPRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 53 | undated | TPRM, CDN | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fairtprm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Fair TPRM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Fair TPRM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Free, open-source third-party risk management (TPRM) and GRC compliance platform with FAIR risk quantification, continuous security monitoring, and 170+ assessment questions mapped to 9 compliance frameworks including NIST AI RMF.
- For
- security teams of any size and budget
- Price stated
- 100% free and open-source fairtprm.com
- Starting price
- 0 fairtprm.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free 15-day hosted demo also available fairtprm.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Fair TPRM's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: fairtprm.com, fairtprm.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fair TPRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fair TPRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fair TPRM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Fair TPRM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fair TPRM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.