IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Fair TPRM · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Fair TPRM

2Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fair TPRM was named 1 time in TPRM, where UpGuard led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 71

under the label threshold

Mid-market13 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In tprm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fair TPRM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Third-party risk management	Security operations	2%	13 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fair TPRM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fair TPRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Fair TPRM (Best Free/Open-Source Choice)” Kimi K2 · TPRM · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fair TPRM, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fair TPRM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LT-VRM2 of 21Not in the top three

UpGuard2 of 20Not in the top three

Bitsight1 of 20Not in the top three

Cynomi1 of 20Not in the top three

Drata1 of 20Not in the top three

Mitti1 of 20Not in the top three

OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management1 of 20Not in the top three

Prevalent Vendor Threat Monitor1 of 20Not in the top three

ProcessUnity1 of 20Not in the top three

SecurityScorecard1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fair TPRM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 2 answers that named Fair TPRM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fairtprm.comYour site1

gartner.com1

github.com1

gitnux.org1

learn.g2.com1

learntprm.com1

mitratech.com1

riskledger.com1

securityboulevard.com1

shieldrisk.ai1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Fair TPRM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fairtprm.com/1

fairtprm.com/articles/open-source-tprm-future.html1

gartner.com/reviews/market/third-party-risk-management-technology-solutions1

github.com/learntprm-design/lt-vrm1

gitnux.org/best/tprm-software1

learn.g2.com/best-third-party-risk-management-software1

learntprm.com/free-tprm-platform1

mitratech.com/zh/%E8%B5%84%E6%BA%90%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83/%E5%8D%9A%E5%AE%A2/best-tprm-softwar1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fair TPRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fair TPRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fairtprm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.