2 categories · Named, not rankedEthicontrol
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 7% | 7 of 77 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Vanta at 14% |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 0% | 36 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“starting with the free tier of RealCSO or exploring Ethicontrol\u2019s fixed low-cost model is often the safest entry point” Qwen 3.7 Flash · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“If you prefer a commercial solution on a tight budget: Start with Ethicontrol or SimpleRisk (free core)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“Featured as the "budget choice" in recent reviews” MiniMax M2.5 · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
“consider Ethicontrol for its low monthly cost” Mistral Small · GRC · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Ethicontrol (~$400+/mo) is ethics-focused, not full GRC.” Grok 4.1 Fast · GRC · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Ethicontrol and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
101 of the 101 domain citations in answers naming Ethicontrol came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ethicontrol's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ethicontrol, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ethicontrol.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.