IT AI Index
Index Vendors › eSentire · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

eSentire

31Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in MDR for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 45 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 20 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In mdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named eSentire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Managed detection and responseSecurity operations11%4 of 450%20accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for eSentire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated eSentire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small20103
DeepSeek V4 Flash02204
Llama 4 Maverick02002
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K203003
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels3
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Highly recommended for mid-market organizations seeking a fully managed, analyst-led MDR service.” Mistral Small · MDR · direct prompt · first choice
“my default recommendation would be eSentire if you want a strong fully managed MDR service” Perplexity Sonar · MDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Arctic Wolf and eSentire are often cited as top choices for mid‑market B2B firms” GLM 4.7 FlashX · MDR · direct prompt · first choice
“If I had to give a single default recommendation ... Start with eSentire” GPT-5.4 mini · MDR · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as eSentire, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and eSentire was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response24 of 316Not in the top three
Sophos MDR22 of 310Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete21 of 3112Not in the top three
Red Canary18 of 310Not in the top three
Expel16 of 311Not in the top three
Huntress Managed EDR16 of 311Not in the top three
Rapid7 MDR15 of 310Not in the top three
SentinelOne Singularity MDR13 of 312Not in the top three
Ontinue10 of 310Not in the top three
Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response6 of 310Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named eSentire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 31 answers that named eSentire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com24
gbhackers.com22
cybersecuritynews.com20
cyberpress.org12
consilien.com9
rapid7.com9
checkthat.ai8
corporatevision-news.com8
huntress.com8
paloaltonetworks.com8

128 of the 128 domain citations in answers naming eSentire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as eSentire

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as eSentire; a claim can dispute any of them.
Esentire 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when eSentire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as eSentire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at esentire.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack