Three of fourteen models named Amazon EKS first on the direct prompt; zero named DigitalOcean Kubernetes. Amazon EKS was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and DigitalOcean Kubernetes by thirteen and Amazon EKS carries 71 labels and DigitalOcean Kubernetes 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the managed kubernetes platforms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Amazon EKS and DigitalOcean Kubernetes were named in the same answer 107 times, of the 214 answers naming Amazon EKS and the 121 naming DigitalOcean Kubernetes. In those answers DigitalOcean Kubernetes took the first choice forty-four times and Amazon EKS seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid EKS / AKS / GKE if you need low operational overhead on a tight budget or want maximum portability.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Big 3 (GKE/AKS/EKS) due to control plane fees” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“"the worst managed Kubernetes provider out of all the major players."” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“AWS EKS or Google GKE are often the safest bets due to their maturity, extensive ecosystems, and reliability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“For most teams, the shortlist is Amazon EKS, Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS).” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Go with Amazon EKS (with Karpenter) if you are already on AWS and want the largest ecosystem of tools and talent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Platforms to Avoid or Use with Caution ### 1. DigitalOcean Kubernetes - Main concerns: No enterprise-grade SLA” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid smaller providers if you need robust, scalable, and fully supported production environments.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Status: ❌ Generally Avoid for Enterprise/Critical Workloads” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“I'd recommend starting with DigitalOcean or Civo as they offer the best balance of cost, simplicity, and reliability” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“DigitalOcean's DOKS (DigitalOcean Kubernetes) stands out as one of the best-managed options among reliable providers.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is usually DigitalOcean Kubernetes because it has a free control plane” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.