IT AI Index
Index Vendors › CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence · September 2026 Edition
CrowdStrike · 1 category · Named, not ranked

CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence

4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence was named 3 times in Threat intel, where NordStellar led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Threat intelligence platformsSecurity operations0%31 of 1280%3under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CrowdStrike excels in speed/attribution” Grok 4.1 Fast · Threat intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Anomali ThreatStream4 of 40Not in the top three
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence4 of 40Not in the top three
Recorded Future3 of 41Not in the top three
VirusTotal3 of 41Not in the top three
Cyble Vision3 of 40Not in the top three
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR3 of 40Not in the top three
ThreatConnect3 of 40Not in the top three
Flashpoint2 of 40Not in the top three
Google Threat Intelligence2 of 40Not in the top three
Mandiant2 of 40Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyware.com4
devopsschool.com4
analyticsinsight.net3
securityboulevard.com3
b2breviews.com2
csoonline.com2
cyble.com2
esecurityplanet.com2
expertinsights.com2
upguard.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence / Adversary Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crowdstrike.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack