Index › Products › Concentric · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Concentric

6Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Concentric was named 4 times in DSPM, where Microsoft Purview led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business42 of 127

under the label threshold

Mid-market13 of 105

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Concentric for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data security posture management	Security operations	2%	13 of 105	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Concentric yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Concentric across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“one of the top-rated tools such as Sentra, Concentric, or Cyera” Llama 4 Maverick · DSPM · direct prompt · first choice

“if your data estate is heavily document-centric, Concentric is a better fit” Perplexity Sonar · DSPM · direct prompt · alternative

“Ideal for organizations where document-centric security is a priority” Mistral Small · DSPM · direct prompt · alternative

“3. Concentric - Best if document management is a priority” MiniMax M2.5 · DSPM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Concentric, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Concentric was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sentra6 of 63Not among the top eight

Cyera5 of 62Not among the top eight

Wiz3 of 61Not among the top eight

Microsoft Purview2 of 60Not among the top eight

Orca Security2 of 60Not among the top eight

Varonis Data Security Platform2 of 60Not among the top eight

Amazon Macie1 of 60Not among the top eight

BigID1 of 60Not among the top eight

CrowdStrike1 of 60Not among the top eight

Forcepoint1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Concentric. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Concentric and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org6

forcepoint.com6

cybersecuritynews.com4

orca.security4

g2.com3

sprinto.com3

strac.io3

csoonline.com2

sourceforge.net2

startupstash.com2

No domain is on file for Concentric, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/dspm-tools-by-business-size-26

cybersecuritynews.com/best-dspm-tools/amp4

orca.security/resources/cloud-security-learning/best-dspm-tools4

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dspm-solutions3

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dspm-tools3

sprinto.com/blog/dspm-tools3

strac.io/blog/10-best-dspm-vendors3

csoonline.com/article/2075321/top-12-data-security-posture-management-tools.html2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Concentric

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Concentric's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Concentric, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Concentric by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Concentric is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Concentric, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.