Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 7 of 47
1 category · RankedCodeAnt AI
14Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in SAST for small business buyers
Rank 36 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 51
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market36 of 71
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise35 of 45
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In sast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CodeAnt AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 0% | 36 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 36% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CodeAnt AI held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SAST · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 34 of 65
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 33 of 42, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAST | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 36 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CodeAnt AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CodeAnt AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CodeAnt AI, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeAnt AI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CodeAnt AI, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeAnt AI was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CodeAnt AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named CodeAnt AI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dev.to14
aikido.dev10
codeant.aiYour site10
appsecsanta.com9
checkmarx.com9
safeguard.sh7
augmentcode.com6
expertinsights.com6
jit.io6
deepsource.com5
Seventy-two of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming CodeAnt AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
codeant.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CodeAnt AI takes 0% of first choices and Semgrep takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
codeant.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CodeAnt AI takes 0% of first choices and Semgrep takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sast tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sast tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“codeant ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,282 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,279 · 30 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,004
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 30 clicks and $472 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 36 of 71 in SAST
Segment leader
36%
Semgrep
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on codeant.ai
16,546
subdomains included
Content
542
counted in the table below
Documentation
7
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 417 | 90 | 2026-09-25 | SAST, PTaaS | |
| Comparison | 94 | 45 | 2026-09-24 | SAST, Compliance automation | |
| Case study | 10 | 10 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | SAST, SCA | |
| Report or ebook | 6 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29AI Penetration Testing | Free Scan & 48-Hour Report | CodeAnt AI report or ebook
- 2026-09-29White paper report or ebook
- 2026-09-29Customer stories case study
- 2026-09-29Glossary glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-29Phunware case study
- 2026-09-29Commvault case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page codeant.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow CodeAnt AI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CodeAnt AI is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CodeAnt AI is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Exploit-Based Agentic Security Platform
- For
- built for enterprises
- Price stated
- 20 codeant.ai
- Starting price
- 20 codeant.ai
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial codeant.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGartner Cool Vendor 2026HIPAA CompliantCodeAnt AI SOC2, HIPAA, VAPT Audit Reports
- Customers named
- 11xHockeyStackCommvaultPhunwareNRGTomaArtisanTint
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What CodeAnt AI's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: codeant.ai, codeant.ai/pricing, codeant.ai/customer-stories, codeant.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CodeAnt AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CodeAnt AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CodeAnt AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CodeAnt AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CodeAnt AI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.