IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › CloudSEK · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CloudSEK

19Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CloudSEK was named 5 times in Threat intel, where NordStellar led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business23 of 122

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 128

under the label threshold

Enterprise25 of 105

under the label threshold

In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CloudSEK for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Threat intelligence platforms	Security operations	0%	25 of 128	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by NordStellar at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CloudSEK yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CloudSEK across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“another option for small teams needing broader external risk monitoring, but you should compare entry-level pricing” Mistral Small · Threat intel · budget prompt · alternative

“CloudSEK | Attack path prediction, DRP integration | AI-driven, strong for supply chain; mid-market friendly.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Threat intel · scale prompt · alternative

“Small team wanting broad external risk monitoring: CloudSEK or GreyNoise” Perplexity Sonar · Threat intel · budget prompt · alternative

“CloudSEK delivers real-time intelligence and AI-powered risk prediction at scale.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Threat intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CloudSEK, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CloudSEK was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Recorded Future12 of 195Not in the top three

GreyNoise11 of 193Not in the top three

NordStellar9 of 194Not in the top three

MISP6 of 192Not in the top three

ThreatConnect6 of 191Not in the top three

AlienVault OTX5 of 192Not in the top three

Cyble Vision5 of 191Not in the top three

Flashpoint5 of 190Not in the top three

Mandiant5 of 190Not in the top three

OpenCTI4 of 192Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CloudSEK. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named CloudSEK and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com13

upguard.com13

analyticsinsight.net11

b2breviews.com11

cyware.com10

esecurityplanet.com10

cyble.com9

sourceforge.net9

cloudsek.comYour site8

wiz.io8

Ninety-four of the 102 domain citations in answers naming CloudSEK came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-threat-intelligence-tools13

upguard.com/blog/best-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-vendors12

b2breviews.com/threat-intelligence-platforms11

esecurityplanet.com/products/threat-intelligence-platforms10

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/best-threat-intelligence-platforms9

analyticsinsight.net/cybersecurity/10-best-threat-intelligence-platforms-in-20268

cyble.com/knowledge-hub/top-best-threat-intelligence-platforms8

cyware.com/blog/top-threat-intelligence-platforms-and-solutions8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CloudSEK's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CloudSEK, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudsek.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.