AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Cisco Identity Services Engine · October 2026 Edition
Cisco · 3 categories · Ranked

Cisco Identity Services Engine

60Judge labels
17First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
31% in NAC for enterprise buyers
Rank 19 of 94 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Cisco Identity Services Engine →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In microsegmentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cisco Identity Services Engine for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
MicrosegmentationNetwork and edge2%19 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by ColorTokens Xshield at 25%
Network access controlNetwork and edge0%22 of 11113%15accepted challenger
Data center networkingNetwork and edge0%131 of 165100%1under 10 labels · led by Arista Networks at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cisco Identity Services Engine yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cisco Identity Services Engine across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small10113
DeepSeek V4 Flash10012
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash12003
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels8
Paraphrase11 labels7
Comparative22 labels18not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 35 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Cisco ISE is widely considered the market leader in enterprise-grade NAC, offering the most comprehensive feature set for large, complex networks.” MiniMax M2.5 · NAC · comparative prompt · first choice
“Offers easy deployment and low long-term costs, making it a good choice for budget-conscious organizations already in the Cisco ecosystem.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Microsegmentation · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Cisco ISE if your network is already Cisco-centric and you want a mature enterprise NAC platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · NAC · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need strict enterprise policy governance, Cisco ISE is usually the benchmark.” Perplexity Sonar · NAC · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid if you're a mid-sized company, have a mixed-vendor network, or lack a dedicated NAC engineer.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NAC · negative prompt · hard negative
“it is more complex and costly, and its licensing model can be restrictive for mid-sized companies” Mistral Small · NAC · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“multiple critical remote‑code‑execution flaws” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Data center networking · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cisco Identity Services Engine, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cisco Identity Services Engine was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Portnox Cloud36 of 605Not among the top eight
Fortinet FortiNAC33 of 601Not among the top eight
Forescout29 of 600Not among the top eight
HPE Aruba ClearPass18 of 601Not among the top eight
Aruba ClearPass17 of 603Not among the top eight
PacketFence7 of 601Not among the top eight
HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager6 of 601Not among the top eight
Ivanti Policy Secure6 of 600Not among the top eight
Juniper Mist Access Assurance6 of 600Not among the top eight
Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager5 of 600Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cisco Identity Services Engine. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 60 answers that named Cisco Identity Services Engine and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org31
portnox.com31
cybersecuritynews.com27
gartner.com27
us.fitgap.com26
comparitech.com25
elisity.com23
g2.com23
virima.com22
cloudnuro.ai21

256 of the 256 domain citations in answers naming Cisco Identity Services Engine came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Cisco Identity Services Engine stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“cisco identity services engine”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
15 a month
Its own site
It sits on Cisco's site (cisco.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 19 of 94 in microsegmentation
Segment leader
25%
ColorTokens Xshield
First choices
17 across its categories
Named in
60 answers
Its own site cited
in 53 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Cisco Identity Services Engine

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cisco Identity Services Engine; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) 17

Follow Cisco Identity Services Engine

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cisco is the company behind Cisco Identity Services Engine.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cisco Identity Services Engine's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cisco Identity Services Engine, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cisco Identity Services Engine by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cisco Identity Services Engine is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cisco Identity Services Engine, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cisco.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.