AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Forescout · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Forescout

81Judge labels
1First choices
30Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in NAC for enterprise buyers
Rank 24 of 111 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Forescout →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In nac · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Forescout for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network access controlNetwork and edge0%24 of 11130%23criticized challenger
MicrosegmentationNetwork and edge0%77 of 9450%2under 10 labels · led by ColorTokens Xshield at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Forescout yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Forescout across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast01124
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02046
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX02013
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase13 labelsNone
Comparative27 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative81 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Forescout wins when your biggest problem is the tens of thousands of devices on your network that can't have an agent installed.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NAC · comparative prompt · alternative
“Forescout if your network has a lot of agentless IoT/OT visibility needs and you have a larger budget” Perplexity Sonar · NAC · direct prompt · alternative
“Best if: You need deep, agentless visibility across a mix of PCs, servers, IoT, OT, and medical devices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NAC · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Forescout excels wherever visibility of unmanaged, IoT, or OT devices is the primary challenge” GLM 4.7 FlashX · NAC · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be especially cautious if you have older network infrastructure... The risk of network disruption is higher than with other NACs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NAC · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Cisco/Aruba/Forescout – these are enterprise-priced” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NAC · budget prompt · hard negative
“Complex deployment (appliances at every site), expensive licensing, steep learning curve — commonly reported as too heavy for mid-sized teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · NAC · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Better for IoT/OT visibility but still faces structural integration issues with firewalls and network infrastructure” Kimi K2 · NAC · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Forescout, over the 81 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Forescout was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Portnox Cloud57 of 8124Not among the top eight
Cisco ISE39 of 816Not among the top eight
Fortinet FortiNAC34 of 810Not among the top eight
Aruba ClearPass30 of 811Not among the top eight
Cisco Identity Services Engine29 of 8120Not among the top eight
HPE Aruba ClearPass23 of 814Not among the top eight
PacketFence11 of 814Not among the top eight
FortiNAC9 of 810Not among the top eight
Juniper Mist Access Assurance9 of 810Not among the top eight
OPSWAT MetaAccess9 of 810Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Forescout. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 79 of the 81 answers that named Forescout and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

portnox.com57
cyberpress.org53
cybersecuritynews.com47
us.fitgap.com39
peerspot.com38
comparitech.com37
g2.com34
gartner.com34
purple.ai32
elisity.com31

402 of the 402 domain citations in answers naming Forescout came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

forescout.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Forescout takes 0% of first choices and Portnox Cloud takes 35%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “network access control solution”
3
Position for “network access control solutions”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“forescout”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
148 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,690 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,942 · 107 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,433
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
59 ads · 59 text · 41 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2022, as Forescout Technologies Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 15 in the year, 44 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 111 in NAC
Segment leader
35%
Portnox Cloud
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
81 answers
Its own site cited
in 79 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on forescout.com
1,918
subdomains included
Content
1,472
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
45 · 155
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1,085372026-10-01NAC, BAS
News or press15472026-09-09NAC, ZTNA
Webinar or virtual event8022026-08-27
Glossary or explainer5222026-09-29ZTNA, ITAM
Report or ebook4022026-08-21NAC, XDR
Case study3402026-04-23
Conference or event902026-02-05
Comparison912026-07-08
Template or tool702025-10-14
Podcast or video2undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on forescout.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page forescout.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Forescout

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Forescout; a claim can dispute any of them.
ForeScout 2Forescout Platform 2Forescout CounterACT / Forescout Platform 1Forescout Platform (Forescout eyeSight / Vistaro) 1Forescout Platform (eyeSight / eyeControl / eyeSegment) 1

Follow Forescout

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Forescout is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Manage cyber risk and mitigate threats, continuously.
For
organizations
Integrations claimed
180 forescout.com
Customers named
AESBCBSDepartment of Water ResourcesCreditHumanDalli GroupDISAGlobal Credit UnionHumana
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Forescout's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: forescout.com, trust.forescout.com, forescout.com/product, forescout.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Forescout's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Forescout, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Forescout by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Forescout is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Forescout, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at forescout.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.