Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 22 of 114
1 category · RankedCISA AIS
17Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Threat intel for small business buyers
Rank 52 of 119 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business28 of 126
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market52 of 119
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise36 of 83
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CISA AIS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intelligence platforms | Security operations | 0% | 52 of 119 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by MISP at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CISA AIS held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Threat intel · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 69 of 111
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 → 36 of 78
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 52 of 119 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CISA AIS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CISA AIS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CISA AIS, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CISA AIS was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CISA AIS, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CISA AIS was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CISA AIS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named CISA AIS and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vectra.ai17
upguard.com12
g2.com9
underdefense.com9
b2breviews.com8
sourceforge.net8
cyware.com7
learn.g2.com7
us.fitgap.com7
flare.io6
Ninety of the ninety domain citations in answers naming CISA AIS came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cisa.gov is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CISA AIS takes 0% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cisa.gov is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CISA AIS takes 0% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “threat intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “threat intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“cisa ais”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,801,370 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 236,251 · 8,960 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 83,428
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 119 in threat intel
Segment leader
12%
MISP
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cisa.gov
24,582
subdomains included
Content
16,504
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 11,401 | 104 | 2026-09-27 | SD-WAN, MFA | |
| Template or tool | 2,287 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Blog | 2,053 | 55 | 2026-09-24 | MFA, SIEM | |
| Conference or event | 511 | 44 | 2026-10-08 | Logs, SCA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 116 | 57 | 2026-09-17 | SIEM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 68 | 12 | 2026-10-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 33 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Case study | 26 | 2 | 2026-09-01 | MFA | |
| Comparison | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-08Active shooter preparedness webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-08Personal security considerations workshop conference or event
- 2026-10-08Active shooter preparedness webinar training 9 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-27Cybersecurity advisories news or press
- 2026-09-24Icsa 26 209 02 news or press
- 2026-09-24Icsa 26 267 01 news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cisa.gov exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SD-WAN (12); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as CISA AIS
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CISA AIS; a claim can dispute any of them.
CISA AIS (Automated Indicator Sharing) 1
Follow CISA AIS
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CISA AIS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CISA AIS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CISA AIS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CISA AIS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CISA AIS, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.