Index › Products › CalypsoAI · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CalypsoAI

10Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CalypsoAI was named 5 times in AI security, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business58 of 147

under the label threshold

Mid-market59 of 233

under the label threshold

Enterprise55 of 155

under the label threshold

In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CalypsoAI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	59 of 233	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CalypsoAI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CalypsoAI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Policy enforcement across models, runtime + governance; strong integrations for multi-model use.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI security · comparative prompt · alternative

“The Gateway Alternative: CalypsoAI Best for Proxy-First Governance and Compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Excellent governance/observability for LLM fleets; good if heavy on multi-model usage.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Custom pricing, typically enterprise-focused with complex deployment” Kimi K2 · AI security · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CalypsoAI, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CalypsoAI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HiddenLayer7 of 100Not among the top eight

Lakera Guard5 of 101Not among the top eight

Protect AI4 of 102Not among the top eight

SentinelOne Singularity4 of 101Not among the top eight

Credo AI3 of 100Not among the top eight

Lasso Security3 of 100Not among the top eight

Wiz3 of 100Not among the top eight

Aim Security2 of 101Not among the top eight

Nudge Security2 of 101Not among the top eight

Adversa AI2 of 100Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CalypsoAI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 10 answers that named CalypsoAI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reco.ai5

securityboulevard.com5

venn.com5

witness.ai5

sentinelone.com4

coralogix.com3

nudgesecurity.com3

sourceforge.net3

wecompareai.com3

acronis.com2

No domain is on file for CalypsoAI, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

reco.ai/compare/ai-security-tools-for-enterprises5

venn.com/learn/ai-security/ai-security-tools5

coralogix.com/ai-blog/top-7-genai-security-tools-to-safeguard-your-ais-future3

wecompareai.com/blog/daily-ai-compare-2026-03-29-ai-security-platforms-compared-whos-actua3

witness.ai/blog/ai-security-platform3

acronis.com/en/blog/posts/best-ai-security-tools-smb2

buildmvpfast.com/blog/compliance-security-tools-ai-enterprises2

cio.com/article/4223016/16-governance-tools-for-securing-your-ai-fleet-2.html2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CalypsoAI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CalypsoAI; a claim can dispute any of them.

Lakera/CalypsoAI 1

Follow CalypsoAI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CalypsoAI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CalypsoAI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CalypsoAI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CalypsoAI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CalypsoAI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.